Moderator fights, moderator fights! Get your peanuts, popcorn, soda, hot dogs!
Programs, and pom poms!
We will open the odds on these battles with
Nikrz 2 - 1 DavidB Odds
DavidB 3 - 1 Jillgat Odds
Place your bets!
Moderator fights, moderator fights! Get your peanuts, popcorn, soda, hot dogs!
Programs, and pom poms!
We will open the odds on these battles with
Nikrz 2 - 1 DavidB Odds
DavidB 3 - 1 Jillgat Odds
Place your bets!
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. "
Jonathan Swift
When did you do that? Which thread was that in? Did I miss something? 
>< DARWIN >
__L___L
I’ll take those odds, and lay my money on DavidB in both cases. After all, to hear recent trolls, he is Satan Incarnate.
Felice
“There’s always a bigger fish.”
[[When did you do that? Which thread was that in? Did I miss something?]]
No, you did not miss anything. And, if I recall, we all agreed to drop it a long time ago.
Jill
David is Brian?
Tom~
So is Drain dating both of them? And if David is Satan on one forum and God in another, does this say anything about the dual nature of the Godhead?
I’m so confused . . .
Andros, we’ll be covering that in Advanced Theology.
Just as I thought. It’s dropped. (And my question was my way of tempting your accuser(s) to produce evidence you dissed the white “race”. I never actually believed you had done it.)
>< DARWIN >
__L___L
Felice said:
Of course, if I am Satan, I’ll let you make your bets on me, then I’ll bet against myself and throw the match…
Leave me out of this!
If David is an athiest - I believe a Pounder once uncovered this dark secret and exposed his views to the world - he doesn’t even believe in me.
Yer pal,
Satan
Page eight???
Hmmm.
Maybe NA will get his way and this thread will just keep going and going until Davidb resigns is replaced…
…or retires.
wouldn’t that be ironic?
I think this thread got way off topic back at like page 3. Lynn, can we close this thread or move it to great debates seeing as how everyone seems to have an opinion on it?!?! (okay the GD thing was just a joke) But seriously, what are the guidelines for a thread no longer having anything to do with the original topic? Can you close a thread for that reason?
Not that it really matters much, but I am getting tired of wading through this thing everyday on the slight chance that it is back on topic.
“I celebrate myself, and sing myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” --Whitman
Who said that?! Where’s that typing coming from?
Weird…
Threads WILL drift, that’s the nature of this board. People still seem to be interested in the current discussion, so I’m going to let it continue for a while. However, I’m going to reconsider closing this thread if it gets to page 10 or 11. Right now, I have to remove some duplicate posts, so if you’ll excuse me…
Lynn
For the Straight Dope
Um…I think the odds of it getting back on topic are fairly slim, as Newtons original idea- that DavidB should resign or be replaced- got shot down pretty hard. But SinsApple, if you want it to get back on topic, then by all means post something to that effect. If the current thread doesn’t interest you and doesn’t appear to be veering back towards a topic that WOULD interest you… don’t read it. Where is the difficulty in this?
Yes, let’s get back on topic.
This message board is available to everyone.
The one rule is “Don’t be a jerk.”
Some people like to make unreasonable assertions, state opinion as fact, are not willing to back up their contentions with evidence or reason, or become quite agitated and insulting when they are asked to do so.
On occasion DavidB has been known to ::ahem::
take issue with such people and their ideas.
I think it’s safe to say that these people consider DavidB a jerk.
Now, sexual harrasssment is in the eye of the harrassed. I see no reason why it should be any different “with being a jerk.”
Since some people (NA for one) thought DavidB was a jerk, then in NA’s eyes he was, and is in violation of the board’s rule.
Therefore I suggest he should resign, be replaced, or…
Swear to uphold idiocy, ignorance, arbitrariness, and lunacy from now on.
My ideas are currently being studied by experts at Cambridge… …SO THERE!!!
Watch South Park much?
Scylla said:
Ah, I see you haven’t been to proper sexual harassment training.
Actually, sexual harassment is not in the eye of the harassed. It is a “reasonable person” standard. If a “reasonable person” would believe the actions constitute sexual harassment, then the person doing it could be in trouble.
Here at the SDMB, the only people whose opinions matter are the Admins. If they think you are being a jerk, you are gone. Now, they are incredibly reasonable people, so one might suggest that the standard is the same.
Rysdad: Nope, I’ve never seen even a second of the show, but I know some of the plots just from people talking about them.
I know a couple of posters who are going to love seeing you post that.