DavidB:
So you think that this is actually the genetic defect of one individual, and not the symptom of a contagious disease, correct?
::sniff sniff::
FormerposterMikeyGigolo doesn’t smell like Phaedrus. Or ED. or others less memorable.
but then I’m…
Often wrong… NEVER in doubt
and from whence does one’s true Troll nature evolve??
† Jon †
Phillipians 4:13
Well, to overanalyze the situation further…
NewtonsApple’s comments upon the Mormonism thread were an attempt to state (infactually and inccorectly) that Mormonism is a cult; Navigator, I believe, pointed out that the issue had just come up on the LBMB as well. N/A also tried to postulate Christianity as the only ‘proven’ religion.
N/A/formerposter also talks about ‘another message board’ with ‘a group of other people’ looking to take down David B. in specific.
N/A, when reviving the “Breast Englargement” thread, used the phrase “bump”, which was unheard of on the SDMB until LBMB members arrived, and even since then has been very rare.
So we know that N/A is a fervent Christian. He frequents an MB that has people upon it that take personal umbrage to David B. in particular, and take out their aggression through insane statements and personal attacks.
I think we’re continuing to get assholes from LBMB filtering in to try and disrupt the SDMB.
BTW- what was the name of the really insane LBMB poster, the one with all of the conspiracy theories? Wasn’t it Mike? As in Mikeylikesit?
Just rambling, incoherent theories on my part, I guess…
JMCJ
Just confirming that my ass is, in fact, the wisest part of my body.
Oh man, this is great.
NA, man, you crack me up. You’ve been sitting in your room listening to the Backstreet Boys for a while now, trying to come up with a way to get yourself out of this one. The “house-sitting” thing is a masterstroke of idiocy. It shows that you have the creativity to eventually come up with something, although you lack the abstract reasoning skills to actually think it through. This points to the fact that you’re 14 years old (I used to do the same kind of crap when I was that age).
In addition, you’ve lied so many times that you’re starting to lose track yourself, and you’ve made it so blatantly obvious that you’re lying it’s almost disgusting. Or do all wealthy currency spectators house-sit in the middle of the week at the beginning of the new fiscal year?
This thread has produced some great moments, though, like when you said
…when you yourself registered 10 days ago!!!
Now, let’s play a little more of “Guess the Troll’s Age.”
In “The high I’m _____ thread,” you put this as you’re “profile.”
“My name: Newton(real name may come later)”
The choice of “Newton” reflects someone who is just learning about physics. Perhaps a freshman. In addition, the very notion of supplying your real name on the internet, even in a forum as seemingly benign as the SDMB, is strictly adolescent.
“gender: Male”
No argument here.
“Marital status: Married”
This is the part that doesn’t fit. One would thing that he’d want to portray himself as a single “swinger.” He must just be crazier than we think.
“Age: 25”
Oh, so you can be a wealthy currency spectator at twenty-five now? I suppose you graduated from the Wharton School at 17 or so…
Education: lots(more later as I know you all)
By “lots” you mean “I’m in the science club at school,” right? Because having “lots” of education AND already advancing yourself to the level of “wealthy currency spectator” by 25 is quite impressive, Doogie.
“Location: northern California”
This brings up another point. Riddle me this: why would somebody who is obviously one of the great budding minds of the next generation, somebody who boasts “lots of education,” somebody who has accomplished so very much in such a short time, have such trouble with that pesky capitalization thing? And, on a similar note, why would he confuse homophones in the title of his thread?
“Sexual Pref: Straight- very”
Let’s run with this one for a minute. Typically, an educated married white-collar man would not even include this section. The very fact that you included it at all says that you’re trying to assert something. If we follow that reasoning to its next step, we discover that you have either repressed or not-so-repressed sexual issues. Don’t worry, these are common to 14-year-olds who name themselves after physicists. Now, I’d like to refer to kellibelli’s “armchair psychology,” wherein she theorized that you have an anal fantasy about your mother. This is probably true, given the fact that Freud’s “Anal” stage comes sometime around early pubescence (that’s you). Don’t worry about this, either, you’ll move onto the “Phallic” stage soon (that’s when the masturbation is gonna really pick up). However, I wouldn’t necessarily throw out the hypothesis that you are gay. The fact that, after asserting that you were straight, you had to add “very,” suggests that you are somewhat uncomfortable with this fact.
Now, I wouldn’t say that I “like” David B. I think that sometimes he’s a little quick to the gun, and he has a tendency to use convoluted logic, and I will even grant you that he targets certain posters. But that makes him no different than most of the people on this board. He is, however, different from you, and Mikey, and Konrad, and bj0rn, and the others of you ilk, in that every now and then he does excercise a certain grasp on reality and logic by coming up with something constructive to say. You, on the other hand…
But whatever, because that “house-sitting” thing was so pathetic it nearly made me piss myself.
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
I am SOOO GLAD I called this guy out and started to ignore him a little while ago.
Yer pal,
Satan
That was supposed to be “your ilk” in the last paragraph there. I normally would assume that you all understand that it was a typo, but I have uttered the “bj-word,” which means he’s on his way to this thread right now.
The IQ of a group is equal to the IQ of the dumbest member divided by the number of people in the group.
Wow, this thread moves fast! All I’m going to say is formerposter is a whiny-assed pissant.
“I hope life isn’t a big joke, because I don’t get it,” Jack Handy
No, David, NA and I are not the same person, I just recently ran across him for the first time myself.
However, after reading the headlights thread, and some of this one, I feel just a bit of sympathy for him.
IMHO, I have always thought that the role of moderator meant to maintain a board, and post if you have something to contribute to the discussion. It seems like you have overstepped that a bit David. I am not trying to criticize, but it just seems like you are overly abusive towards NA. He asked you (in a non-bbq board may I remind you) to not attack him, which it did seem like you were doing. He must have had some reason to feel this way. Instead of trying to understand that, you further insulted him and said you would point out his ignorant posts everytime you saw them.
Here is a quote from the moderator application, tell me if I am wrong in feeling like you are violating this to atleast some extent with your antagonistic attitude towards users:
Beyond that, you’re free to participate in the discussion - up to a point.
Bear in mind that as a representative of management you’ll undercut your
authority if you are overly partisan, lose your temper, etc. Granted
sometimes this takes superhuman patience. If you’re not the patient type,
maybe board moderating isn’t for you. We’ll review your work, in the early
going particularly, and let you know how you’re doing.
“I celebrate myself, and sing myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” --Whitman
John,
I don’t agree with your assessment, I think NA has proven by his fruit that he is not Christian.
That he may frequent LB, that may be true. If that is the case why do you guys keep banning him?? Let him stay, we don’t want him either. 
Someone needs to opena Message Board ‘For Sock-Puppet’s Only’ and let them all congregate there.
Peace.
† Jon †
Phillipians 4:13
Personally, my sock puppet takes offense at your lumping him in with other weird folks!!!
Okay, I hate to post twice in a row, but I had to comment that the coincidence of finding someone with almost the exact same handle as myself is actually a little creepy.
A few years ago I actually did post as newton and newton’s apple in other chat rooms and such. That eventually mutated into SINsApple which I have used now for almost two years no matter where I post or chat.
But I must restate that NA and I are in fact not related, or one and the same or anything like that. I am a 20 year old unmarried female while he is apparently a 25 year old married male.
I hope this clears it up for everyone.
“I celebrate myself, and sing myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” --Whitman
You better watch out John, I’ll sig mipsman on ya.
Navigator- point taken, understood. I apology for the way I phrased it; and you are right that N/A is in no way a real Christian.
Hmm. I need a good term for someone who believes that, as a self-professed ‘Christian’, they have complete liscence to spew hatred and bigotry because they’ve been ‘forgiven’ while their enemies are ‘Hell-bound.’
Hmm. “Hate-ian” sounds a bit too close to “Haitian”.
Anyone have a suggestion?
JMCJ
Just confirming that my ass is, in fact, the wisest part of my body.
John, how about Pat Buchanan?
“Many count their chickens before they are hatched; and where they expect bacon, meet with broken bones.”
–Miguel de Cervantes–
SINsApple, if you don’t know what’s going on, shut the fuck up.
Thank you.
Sorry, the Cliche Clique is not accepting new members at this time,
Okay im going to make a stretch on my first post but I feel Im entitled too. I “lurked” here for long enough to know when I see something wrong. I hate to say this but I have to side with SINsApple. I think there is some validity to the attacks. Furthermore I believe that Newton and Formerposter are two seperate persons. At which point this happens I am not sure but I can see that he was in fact an amicable poster up until recently. Lets leave this situation alone until perhaps Newtons return in some form or another or until we hear from administration that they have heard from Newton.
Danny
PS dont start with a bunch of melarkey about me being new and from hotmail. Its very common and I felt I should say something after “spectating” enough.
John,
You can try ‘cruelist’ but that might be taken 
† Jon †
Phillipians 4:13
John,
how about a mockery? mockeriast?
“I celebrate myself, and sing myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” --Whitman
Wally,
That is just it though, I firmly believe I do know what is going on.
I have read posts from NA before he was pissed off, and I read the thread that pissed him off. I think he had reason to be angry (albeit, maybe not this angry).
And unless you know what I know, well, take your own advice.
“I celebrate myself, and sing myself, and what I assume you shall assume, for every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you.” --Whitman
Hi Danny!
As much as I respect your opinion, you are wrong about one thing, Newton was a jerk early on. Read his ‘high I’m____’ thread. He got real snotty real fast, anddownright ignorant to Frankie.
That said, I also believe that NA and formerposter are 2 diff people, they just dont post alike.
Danny and SINsapple make points about NA being attacked by DavidB, sure he was, but David B is like that with everyone, including me. Even if he did have a vendetta against another poster, saying : He cant post after me!!" is not the remedy. Thats like a childs game, “Times!” “not-it!”
etc.
Danny I admire you balls (well, metaphorically) to make your first post here, that was a brave thing to do, considering the climate right now.
Welcome to you, (and despite what you read, dont worry about pissing me off)