British spelling uses the second “e”. It’s perfectly acceptable (and arguably more sensible).
It is not argueably more senseible. We drop e’s all the time.
Running a search restricted to timesonline.co.uk sites, we find:
“judgemental” (site:timesonline.co.uk "judgemental" - Google Search) gets 448 g-hits
“judgemental” (site:timesonline.co.uk "judgmental" - Google Search) gets 872 g-hits
Just because you declare it’s not arguably more sensible doesn’t make it a fact (“arguably” being the key word). Thanks for the condescension, but I don’t need a lesson in English usage. Just because we drop es (why would there be an apostrophe there? It’s a plural, not a possessive - oh, wait, I guess we do that all the time, too) from some words doesn’t mean it’s somehow more valid to do so. The way you’re nitpicking over such petty bullshit makes you come off as a pretentious ass.
I have decided that today I live in the country of I’m Fucking Right about Everything, where I spell judgmental as judgemental.
Because I think it’s fucking retarded. I haven’t made that clear? I’m confused why you quoted both of those back to me, too.
Oh, and:
Glass houses, Miss Gibbler, glass houses. I suggest you take a look at how you spelled your two search words in your post.
In my estimation, the Wiccan movement is a fledgling attempt to reach a spiritual awareness that is free of the taint of theology, worship as communion rather than adoration and obedience. They utterly lack the discipline of a hierarchy and a set doctrine, which is all to the good, so far as I can tell.
As for the relentless rationalism of those who rush for the chance to publicly preen and polish their skepticism…well, thats all quite good, no doubt, the rational mind is a marvelous tool, as a hammer is the best approach to a nail. But if all that is good about being human could be reduced to rationalist principles, adding machines would write poetry and coo over a smiling baby. More to heaven and earth, and all that.
You’re the one who had to make the point that that particular spelling made you actually physically ill. Sounds to me like you have an awful lot invested in that for some reason. Or you could just be one of those people who needs everyone to know just how evolved and mature you are, such that non-conventional spellings of words describing concepts in which you don’t believe make you feel like you need to hurl.
Nope, nothing invested, it just rubs me the wrong way. Apparently people posting to message boards with opionions that are at odds with yours have the same effect on you. And is there anything surprising about someone scoffing at Wiccans in a thread started to… scoff at Wiccans?
Oh my goodness gracious! How mortifying!
Can someone point me to a thread where Kimmy is actually a pleasant and wonderful person?
May I offer you a fan and a fainting couch?
Well, there are all the threads that Kimmy hasn’t posted in…
Touché.
I don’t think she’s going to take me up on the fan and fainting couch, either. I feel so rejected. 
This is the Pit, so in the words of a David Cross album title…
Would it make you feel better if I mentioned that I am a dude?
Not particularly. They’re a very nice fan and fainting couch. If it would make you feel more comfortable, I could decorate them with footballs, beer, and naked ladies.
Oh, and:
No, it isn’t very funny, is it?
Well, it does make me feel slightly better about women in general.
AKA the “Alanis” sense of the word.
IIRC, a discussion in a seminar I once took on irony came to the conclusion that exactly one thing in that song might actually qualify as ironic.
SO, NO, ALANIS, I DON’T THINK.