Debate Newsweek's 2010 Politics Predictions

Here.

10. Democrats Steal Texas Governor’s Mansion. Ultraconservative Pub incumbent Rick Perry battles it out with moderate Kay Bailey Hutchinson for the nomination. It’s so bloody and vituperative that, while Perry wins the primary, he loses the general election to Houston Mayor Bill White.

Sounds plausible to an outsider. Texas Dopers?
9. Obama Does Nada on Gay Rights. Because he doesn’t want to threaten the prospects of his own legislative agenda with socially divisive policies/rhetoric.

Sounds very plausible indeed to me. In fact, sounds like the right call for him to make. (Sorry, gayguys.)
8. Obama Gets Second Court Pick. Cancer-ridden Ruth Bader Ginsburg resigns. Obama nominates Seventh Circuit Judge Diane Wood, who “would confidently sit on the court’s left side,” and dissented in decisions upholding late-term abortion bans. She is confirmed after a bitter partisan battle in the Senate.

Sounds likely overall – but are there any possibilities other than Wood?
7. Dodd Loses Seat. Long-serving Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) finds “his fancy credentials can no longer appease the twin personalities of Connecticut voters. For the socially liberal Yankees, Dodd has become an enabler of corporate excess: the man who accepted sweetheart mortgage loans from Countrywide Financial and who approved bonuses for AIG executives at the same time the firm was receiving government bailout money.Simultaneously, Dodd has alienated his other constituents: the fiscally conservative hedge-fund and financier donors. The last thing they want to hear about is increased financial regulation. And, Dodd in an effort to separate himself from the coziness between Wall Street and Washington, recently unveiled a proposal for much stricter rules on credit-card companies, banks, and mortgage lenders.” No comment on what Pub might unseat him.

Waitaminnit, is it possible any Dem might unseat him? Is he facing any primary challenges?
6. Florida Elects Sen. Crist. Moderate Pub Governor Charlie Crist edges out ultraright challenger Marco Rubio “by a whisker and, given the weakness of his likely Democratic opponent, U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek, he’ll go on to capture the seat.”

I think it’s too soon to call. Frankly, Floridians don’t think much of Charlie Crist – that is, we don’t think of him much, for good or for ill. He has not been a very high-profile governor. The only thing everybody knows about him is that, despite his recent marriage to a supermodel, he is almost certainly gay (which, believe it or not, was not an issue at all, or much commented on, in the gubernatorial election). But I agree Meek is the most likely Dem nominee; the other candidates are nobodies.
5. Palin Gets Her Talk Show.

Sure, why not? :rolleyes:
4. Troubled California Stays Blue. Pubs Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman lose their bids for senator and governor, respectively. “Both women are hoping populist anger will color the Golden State a redder hue, but they’ve already misstepped by staking their campaigns on an impending backlash to environmental concerns—unwise in the state that lays claim to both San Francisco and Hollywood. Whitman will lose to Golden Boy Jerry Brown. And Fiorina? Electing her would mean replacing high-ranking Barbara Boxer with a junior senator in the minority party.”

Don’t know enough to comment. CaliDopers?
3. GOP Blocks Immigration Reform. The Dems propose immigration reform similar to that floated in 2007, cracking down on employers of undocumented workers while opening a path to citizenship for illegals already here. The backlash is even worse than in 2007, because of high unemployment. “* in the House, where members will be just months away from midterm elections, things will fall apart, as moderate Democrats join a united GOP opposition. Republicans will emerge victorious. Yet in getting there, they’ll employ such strident rhetoric that, in the minds of many, they’ll seal their image as anti-immigrant and anti-Latino. Come November, Hispanics will respond with energetic turnout, helping keep some House seats blue and further ensconcing themselves in the Democratic fold.”

Sounds depressingly predictable. Immigration is almost the only populist issue the GOP has got left.
2. GOP Ousts Reid. Simply because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s approval rating in Nevada is sinking. Newsweek predicts his defeat even though no strong Pub candidate has yet emerged.

I have no idea. NevaDopers?
1. Pelosi Keeps the House. The Dems are going into the midterms with a lot of disadvantages, but “aren’t that popular either, and there are several contests like NY-23 where battles between ultraconservatives and moderate Republicans could hand the seat to a Dem. To the chagrin of the right, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will still own the House; she’ll just have a few less folks to kick around.”

I say this one’s right on the money.
Your opinions?

  1. Democrats Steal Texas Governor’s Mansion. I don’t know enough about Texas politics to bet, but I would be surprised at this. McCain won big here, I can’t see it going to a Dem in a non-presidential year with its lower turnout.

  2. Obama Does Nada on Gay Rights. I would not be surprised. I’m still waiting to see his line in the sand.

  3. Obama Gets Second Court Pick. Quite likely. If only the vacancy would come from the Thomas-Scalito axis.

  4. Dodd Loses Seat. He still has some time to come back. Let’s see his opponent first.

  5. Florida Elects Sen. Crist. Quite likely, in my estimation.

  6. Palin Gets Her Talk Show. Not in 2010. To do so might make it harder for her to run in 2012 or 2016.

  7. Troubled California Stays Blue. Yes, I can definitely see this one.

  8. GOP Blocks Immigration Reform. Definitely can see this coming. GOP sucks up to its racist base and alienates the biggest growing minority in the US.

  9. GOP Ousts Reid. Like Dodd, he has some time to fix things. We also need to see the opponent.

  10. Pelosi Keeps the House. Money in the bank.

Isn’t Bill White openly homosexual? A gay governor of Texas would fulfill the prophecy as set down by RevCo. :wink:

After the job Tom DeLay did on redistricting? Not a chance. Kay Bailey Hutchison is as close as we’re going to get. Still, she’s a damn sight better than Gov. Good Hair. What hurts her most with Republicans and what will likely get Dems to cross over for her is her stance on abortion (pro choice with restrictions). While the social conservatives will go with Perry for that reason, Hutchison will probably be able to score the Libertarian vote citing ‘personal freedoms.’

I believe #1 will happen in part thanks to #3, minorities that would be mostly republican like Hispanics will turn more democratic thanks to the expected baseless accusations that will be part of the efforts made to block immigration reform.

Why would anyone take abortion into account when voting for Governor?

Because it’s regarded as a “moral” litmus test by the Right.

Because in Texas, your stance on social issues is the yard stick by which you are judged for a large number of voters. At least two of my coworkers have loudly denounced Sen. Hutchison and said they won’t vote for her for precisely that reason. Never mind that Perry has mismanaged the state schools or made ridiculous noises about Texas seceding or that he proclaimed Texas ‘recession proof’ with an unemployment rate of 9%. Kay Bailey Hutchison favors abortion. That’s all they need to know.

I know people who take account of nothing else.

Fair enough, but if it’s the litmus test of the right, what does it have to do with centrists and liberals? The implication I was responding to was that Hutchison’s pro-choice views would work in her favor in the election. I can see why being Pro-Life might help one in the election, but I cannot see how being pro-Choice even matters.

Partly because it’s a litmus test on the Left to a degree, if not so much as on the Right. And because “pro-life” tends to translate as being hostile to the rights of women in general. And because it generally speaks of an association with the Christian fundamentalists.

10 - Not a chance. K-B Hutchinson is seen as too much of a rhino to the conservative base to beat Perry, whom will defeat White in a landslide. It’s questionable whether White would have even won re-election to the Mayor’s position in Houston, had he ran.
9 - No opinion
8 - Very likely he will get a 2nd pick due to the health of Ginsburg - who his selection will be???
7 - Dodd - I don’t place much faith in the ability of the voting public, so it’s still possible he could be re-elected.
6 - no opinion
5 - not likely at this time. Possible at some point in the distant future, depending on the results of whatever her political aspirations may be (again, I don’t place much faith in the voting public)
4 - no opinion, but I can’t imagine it leaning otherwise
3 - GOP blocks Immigration Reform - Guess it depends on what form immigration reform takes this time around. If the bill ends up being broad based amnesty for all illegals, without any concept of a controlled border, there may be too many Congressmen looking over their shoulders in an election year for that to pass.
2 - Reid - Same as #7
1 - Peolsi - Same as #7 & #2

It matters to Democrats and Libertarians (Libertarians and centrists are two different things, btw). Dems found a little bit of a voice last year in the national election. It may spur them to turn out for Hutchison who many see as the lesser of two evils. In addition, Texans take personal liberties very seriously. Hutchison has been hitting Perry on a number of issues near and dear to Texans’ hearts. Failure to take advantage of certain business situations, our schools dropping in rankings (that’s a big one), the trans Texas corridor, being dead last in health care. Plus the man is an idiot. The race is about to get ugly.

We’ll see how that works out. Dallas/Houston and Austin better turn out to vote, because they can’t depend on Presidio county to carry them to the blue promised land. :wink:

You mean, in Texas there’s such thing as the “Libertarian vote”? And it matters?!

Are most Texans for this or against it?

Ron Paul is from Texas.

I don’t think Obama will wade into the gay rights thing until after his re-election in 2012. I would look for 2013 as the year DADT is finally repealed. If not then, then definitely in 2016-17 after the election of the next president

I’m still hoping a meteor hits Scalia and Thomas :wink:

I think Connecticut elects a Dem to replace him, if at all

That’s funny because from someone outside of Florida, we’ve heard a lot about him, mainly that he’s a true moderate willing to cross the line on issues and isn’t an ideologue

A radio talk show is likely. It’ll probably be really stupid though. John Stewart is going to have a field day

Boxer is immensely popular and I doubt she gets unseated. So what if she was annoyed at that general? We have more feminists in this state than conservatives, I think she wins easily. Jerry Brown is also fairly popular and his name carries weight. I don’t see either of the Pubs beating him in a general election

I don’t think the Dems propose anything like that. It’d be stupid to do in an election year and just coming after the hard fought win with health care, it’s too soon to wade into another battle like this. I think the whole Senate/House bill consolidation spends an inordinant amount of time for the first 2-3 months until it is put together, Obama signs it, and then we spend the next 6 months arguing over how effective it is, drowning out most everything else. The Pubs are going to find every anecdote, hearsay, tall tale, rumor, urban legend, and speculation on how it’s hurting people and try to use that to unseat the Dems.

His popularity does seem to be dropping, but will probably go up a bit once health care is signed. I’d have to see his opponent to guess if he’d be ousted

Pubs will never concede defeat, so yeah, more moderate vs. extreme GOP battles will lead to a lot of Dem victories, probably less so than last election. Dems will still have a majority, but it’ll be shrinking

There is and it does. Nor are they considered a fringe group.

Re: the TTC. It broadly exists now in the form of I35. As far as Perry’s plans, he originally garnered support because we were told it would be paid for by making the majority of it tollways and by selling municipal bonds. The tollways usually end up paying for themselves quickly. However, when some of the ranchers and farmers resisted selling large tracts of land, Perry made noises about eminent domain. There was also a shady deal with a Spanish company which guaranteed a lot of money for him and jobs for his friends and family (Rick believes that nepotism is the gift that keeps on giving). Naturally this all went over like a ton of gold bricks and there was a huge outcry. The project supposedly was scrapped by TxDOT, but in reality all they’ve done is change the name and chopped it into manageable pieces. Kay Bailey Hutchison said back in October

‘The Trans-Texas Corridor will not be officially dead until Rick Perry is no longer governor and his political appointees are no longer running TxDOT. Texans can’t trust Rick Perry when it comes to protecting their land from the government, ceasing to lease our highways to foreign companies or ending the Trans-Texas Corridor.’

So yes, the majority of the state is currently against it. At the same time, we want relief from the poor road conditions and traffic, so something is going to have to give and Kay is going to have to give us a viable plan for TxDoT in order for her rhetoric to take hold.

Not now, not ever. He started slapping homosexuals in the face right from the beginning. At best, he is indifferent to them, and quite possibly is just another homophobe. And it’s not like they can vote Republican without doing even worse.

IF the Democrats decide to tackle immigration reform, that’s exactly how the Republicans will act. They are and have been for many years the Bigot Party. They ARE “anti-immigrant and anti-Latino”, not to mention anti- black, gay, Jew, woman, and pretty much everything that isn’t an American conservative straight white male Christian.