There is a
[url=https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wMgNz9ZeY_Y]
really cute video [/url] going viral, showing an 8 year old British girl (with a heavy accent) acting excitedly indignant over the cost of ice cream.
She complains to her mother that the ice cream man was charging 9 pounds for what should only cost 2 pounds, and declares that “he’ll never get anywhere with that”. Then, as she runs off to play with her sister, the girl offers a final sneer at the (unseen) vendor “I’ll bet he can hear me!”
It’s a cute video. It definitely seems genuine, and unscripted.
It appears that the girl’s mother realized that her daughter was upset about something, as she begins the video by asking “tell me what just happened?”
So now for my question, as in the thread title:
How did she film this, and, more importantly, Why ?
As a video production, the clip is perfectly framed. The girl is centered in the picture as she waves her arms and then runs away at the end. The camera moves slightly as necessary, in a natural way, just as your eyes would move if you were watching your daughter tell you something important. For the entire video (30 seconds), the girl is focusing her attention on the camera.
So–here’s what I don’t get:
We have a concerned mother with an emotionally upset child–yet her first reaction is to grab her phone, hold it between her face and her daughter, and start filming–before finding out what the problem is. Then, while the girl rants, the mother keeps the camera centered on the girl, presumably paying more attention to the screen than to her daughter
Is this what modern parenting is like these days?
And do modern children think it is natural and normal to look at a camera-- and not at their mother-- when they get angry and want some comfort?