Y’know, just for the hell of it, I’ll act like this was a serious post and respond.
Nope. I rarely tan, generally burn and then stay untanned.
:: checks mirror ::
[ul]
[li]Eyelids not droopy.[/li][li]Don’t know what a “dust breathing” nose is, but if you mean “big, pointy nose”, nope–normal sized but a little squashed looking.[/li][li]Ears? Yup. Have 'em. But I’ll be you do too.[/li][li]Arrogant facial expression? Nope, generally described as “mellow-looking”, even when I’m in confrontations.[/li][/ul]
Not me. I’m terribly shy. I rarely post because I’m filled with such terrible self-doubt. Ask anyone here. They’ll tell you.
Yes, that is correct. Look at it this way: I want to live in a nation where I can walk into any city and not have to fear for my life because of who I am; I want to fill out a job application and have a reasonable expectation of getting that job based on my abilities alone.
Non-Whites would also benefit: if 5% of the U.S. White population (the most racially aware of Whites) opted for this solution then non-Whites would feel less threatened in the slightly smaller United States. Don’t you agree?
We’ve gotten way (way) too literal and out-of-context with that statement of Ygg’s.
It’s just thinking that went into devising a legal definition of race as opposed to the personal version we normally use when we discuss it. It’s not even the definition itself. The actual definition the guy proposes is in my first post.
Sorry, but there are no White Nationalists that I’m aware of who want to attempt a biological method of determining race for any kind of legal purpose. Not that race isn’t genetic and biological, but it’s not exact. Do you think racist don’t agree with that?
The race-is-only-a-social-construct crowd?
I’d agree that that our sloppy classifications, such as grouping a pygmy and Tiger Woods together in a group called “black”, are complete garbage.
I’d agree that simply observing visual markers of race is useless for political definition of a large group because of “gray areas”.
You will be hard pressed to ever measure 100% pure green or 100% pure red. So, if someone asks you to wear a red shirt, do you claim you can’t do it? There’s no such thing as red? The definition of red is pure garbage and an impossible way to group shirts?
Skin color is just a visual marker that we base our sloppy grouping of races on.
I feel like skipping ahead, I’ve been in this discussion so many times. Is someone waiting to shock me information that there’s more variations within racial categories than between, and so it’s not a useful taxonomy at all?
All you’ll succeed in doing is proving that the classification we use are flawed, and that there’s not a hard edge between races. If you think it’s going to convince anyone that Asian couples don’t produce Asian babies that share a collection of genetic attributes you’re mistaken.
<Sincerity>
Because I want to preserve “diversity” on the planet Earth for all time. Whites are one of the groups I would like to help preserve.
</Sincerity>
How boring it would be if in a thousand years everyone in the world spoke the same language, practiced the same religion, ate the same foods and looked alike.
For me, a few drops of non-White blood does not make a person non-White.
That’s funny. I’m a white male and I already walk in any city without fear of being attacked for being a white male and I always know that I will have an excellent chance to be hired on my abilities (although I may find my white interviewer might discriminate against me because of my age).
I think you’re believing too many anecdotes (many false) without realizing the privileged position you hold. For every act of discrimination against a white guy (who has an equal opporunity as a non-white person to sue for redress), there are dozens of acts of discrimination against blacks, East Asians, South Asians, Soutwest Asians, Latinos, and others.
The diversity-loving white supremacist. Now I’ve seen everything. Whites aren’t a group, and despite thousands of years of cultural interaction, people aren’t even close to being all alike. What makes you think they will be in a few thousand more?
I’d also like an answer to my interracial marriage question.
Sorry, I don’t have much else to contribute. Everyone else is slapping down you Nazis and Klansmen just fine. But as a graphic designer, your words greatly offended me!
You’d think a racist would know a bit more about color…
These are my next questions, and I hope thye’re not what you were thinking:
How do you go about creating a White Nation? I mean the actual mechanics. If it’s put to a vote, and a majority of even the “whites” vote it down, are you OK with that? Are you OK with using violence to create this White Nation?
Once this White Nation is created, why is that you think some Whites won’t exploit other Whites?
It does sound like you want to kick them out of certain areas of the US to make room for Honkytonia, though. Also, you do advocate kicking non-whites out of ‘historically white’ European countries. Why what’s good for the goose isn’t good enough for the gander is beyond me, but oh well. And I think you missed t-keela’s point, which is that the Nazis originally advocated your solution and decided to kill people instead because mass deportation was less practical - and why go to all that trouble to protect your inferiors?
In the second post, I should have said, “I would accept the deportation of Whites……” The word “favor” was a poor choice. In your view, does that resolve the contradiction?
I was going to qualify the statement with “in nature”, but decided that was obvious.
If you define pure green as C 62, M 0, Y 100, K 0, it won’t be easy to go out and find that exact color in nature, though you can synthesize it yes. (If you want to get real picky consider the difficulty of achieving a perfect monitor calibration, and you might not even get it on your monitor).
I’m not a Nazi, or NS. As far as the KKK I’m not even a Christian, so I’m nowhere near it.
I’m a woman. It would be unwise of me to walk the streets at night because being a woman automatically makes me a target. So because of this, I want to form a nation just for women. All people with Y chromosomes will be deported.
How does this plan sound?
I’m black. I would like to interview for a job and be confident that the interviewer will only judge me on the contents of my resume and my ability to answer their questions, without letting racial prejudice influence their perception of me. I would like to live where ever I want without worrying about my white neighbors running away. I would like to go to an upscale store and be treated as nicely as the white shoppers are. I would like my future children to be given the same benefit of the doubt that white children are given, if they should screw up and make wrong decisions.
You are complaining about prejudice and discrimination as if those things were invented as soon as non-whites accrued a little power. But I assure you that prejudice and discrimination will not go away simply by creating a White Utopia. Do you honestly believe that the Kid Rock types can coexist harmoniously with the Martha Stewarts?
Non-whites feel threatened by institutional racism. That won’t go away simply because 5% of the White population moves away.
Actually, I only use Macs with very carefully set ColorSync profiles. So long as I’m looking straight on at my Studio Display, I know that what I’m seeing is what I should be seeing.
And yes, I think I’ve worked with color well enough that I can could identify pure green and pure red in nature. Not that they occur very often.