When I say “inactive” I am referring to the names that have less than 20 or 30 posts and have not posted for the past 6 or 7 months. If those users were to be deleted (NOT delete their posts) how many dopers would we loose?
After browsing thru the Comment on Cecil’s/Staff forums, there seems to be quite a many names that can be booted.
Yeah, while we do have over 30,000 registered, most estimates say we have less than five thousand active (which still seems like a hell of a lot).
We likely wouldn’t delete the names anytime soon. There’s no real reason to. However, when we changed the board software from UBB to vB, some of the user names were lost- the banned ones, for instance. That’s why in older threads, you’ll see posts labeled “Guest.”
Why delete them? We’ve had posters disappear for long stretches and then come back. pldennison and dropzone are two “regs” who’ve disappeared for many months now, but whom I expect to see again.
On a previous thread on this subject, I noted that I’d seen one person whose first post was two and a half years after he’d registered. A lot of these folks lurk. There’s no need to deny their posting priveleges.
What if you want the name of someone who hasn’t posted in a long time, and you contact them by e-mail, and request use of their name, if they have decided not to return?
On my board, I don’t delete those who haven’t posted, but if someone hasn’t posted and visited after a while, they’re gone. My rule of thumb is that they’re gone if …
The last visit was 60 days ago, and they never posted
The last visit was 120 days ago, and they posted only once
The last visit was 180 days ago, and they posted only twice
And so on.