Did Christie (or his staff) intentionally cause the Fort Lee traffic jam?

Hey if your state had the record of crappy governors that we do, you would have term limits too. I mean we haven’t had a decent governor since the 80s. Corsine was worse than Christie and he was better than McGreavy; who resigned in disgrace. :smack:

Sometimes I think we should have a term limit of 1 term instead.

Or maybe half a term, because only dead salmon go with the flow.

The 5-year anniversary of Bridgegate was just a few days ago.

Ready to admit you were wrong?

Wait, you mean there’s still any doubt that Christie deliberately caused the traffic jam?

I’m confused. Do you think he didn’t do it?

Christie’s subordinates in the Bridgegate conspiracy to commit fraud have been convicted and sentenced.

But it appears that the official misconduct case against Christie himself will not be pursued further, so maybe that’s the bit brazil84 is talking about.

Let him have this one. He clearly has so little else of note in his life if he has been counting the days until he could post that.

I didn’t follow the story and just now noticed the bumping. Click further and all I see is ambiguity.

How many of these criminals went to prison? How much time did they get? Real prison or country-club prison for millionaires and politicians?

per Wikipedia, Bill Baroni and Bridget Ann Kelly were both convicted. They each got 500 hours of community service and jail time (two years for Baroni, eighteen months for Kelly).

Further digging doesn’t reveal much, beyond the fact that as of late April of this year, the two were still pursuing appeals of their convictions.

at least he did not break his leg in office like the 3 previous elected NJ governors

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/369322-christie-becomes-first-nj-governor-in-decades-to-avoid-breaking-leg

Does that mean he paid the protection money?

I would ask Tony Soprano except he got whacked in the diner by the guy in the members only jacket :smiley:

Try reading a few more of the later posts in the thread. It should clear up any confusion.

The later posts in this thread consist of you insisting without any evidence at all that he didn’t do it, and everyone else who’s paid attention to the evidence being amazed that you could still be unsure.

I don’t think he’s unsure.

Please quote me where I “insist[ed] without any evidence at all that he didn’t do it.” If you are able to, I will pubclicly apologize to you. And I expect that if you are unable to, then you will publicly apologize to me.

To help you in your quest, you might start looking at what I said in Post #1286.

if Christie was out there he could have blocked 3 lanes just with his body. :slight_smile:

So your repeated bumps to gloat are over what, exactly?

And here is what I said in Post #1241:

But please, show me where I insisted without any evidence that Christie “didn’t do it.”

Actually I’m pretty sure what I said was that I thought it was pretty likely that Christie was complicit in the lane closures.

I don’t recall ever insisting – with or without evidence – that Christie was uninvolved. But I have an open mind and stand ready to publicly apologize if I have mis-characterized my own position.

Just as I expect you and/or Chronos to admit it and publicly apologize if you are the ones who mis-characterized my position.

So, please tell me: Where did I state or imply the certitude you refer to?