Did I ever tell you about the time mswas met Obama?

Well then it’s my responsibility to get you off of my lawn sucka!

It’s not like you guys would stop shit-talking me if I left. So why would I give you the satisfaction? You’re no less condescending than I am.

Mhendo called my caring about Mary Jo Kopechne ‘delusions about Ted Kennedy’. I am beginning to realize that I work with a completely different value system than most of the people on this board. Because to me that’s light years more condescending than, “You don’t understand what I am saying.”, or even calling you a moron when I get frustrated because you keep misquoting me after I’ve tried to explain my point 50 times.

Well, you claimed ownership. That doesn’t make it so.

Well, give it a shot. I won’t be weighing in personally on the Kennedy issue, incidentally.

You’re just a plebe who’s gotten to big for his britches. You built this house on commission. :wink:

I can’t, I’ll get banned. We just have VERY different ideas of condescension. Well maybe not you and I because you haven’t really been getting into the ‘mswas you are condescending and a meaniehead.’ game. I think you are self-aware enough to realize that it’s a two way street.

How that equates to me shifting any blame onto anybody, and how it justifies your own actions. ‘He did it first’ doesn’t give you a free ticket.

I was at pains earlier to point out how it’s not about anybody being insulted, but purely about your own behaviour.

Hell, I don’t even know what you’re on about anymore. I didn’t even make any attempts at analysis or anything like it, and indeed explicitly stated that I couldn’t give a crap about your reasons and hidden motives and whatnot – I can’t know them, I don’t care about them, but I see how you behave and carry yourself.

I didn’t give any reasons.

I can’t understand enough of mswas’s last post to form a specific response.

Your fundamental mistake is that you think I need to justify my actions. That’s where you are confused. If someone doesn’t understand me I am not going to pretend like their mutilation of my viewpoint is accurate.

sigh It is about people being insulted. A lot of people agree with me and point it out regularly. Miller has often pointed out that people really do not understand what I am saying, and The Hamster King has come up with some pretty good posts translating for me.

I’m not on about anything. It’s all of you who have the problem and you are acting like it’s me who has the problem. You don’t like me and it bothers you that I can live with that. You are going on with an analysis. You are trying to tell me, “I don’t get it.”, so this paragraph is just a bunch of bullshit.

Stop means go, 2+2=5 :rolleyes:

Denial, thy name is mswas.

What denial? Would I be here in this Pit thread that I didn’t start arguing when there is no one to argue with?

Seriously.

People are saying I should ignore people who bother me and chill out. Why shouldn’t they ignore me and chill out?

Don’t ask me, I’m just one of the all the rest of us with a problem. How would I know?

I don’t know. It’s sort of a strange obsession for you guys to care so much about me. :stuck_out_tongue:

I mean after all I wouldn’t be condescending to you if you weren’t here trash talking.

Not really. Calling it an “obsession” is likely overstatement, but criticizing the behaviour of another poster is fairly common around here. I suppose if there were five or six threads criticizing you, you might have a better case, but this one is really just a continuation of a thread you yourself started.

No it isn’t. We aren’t even talking about the topic of the other thread.

Your insights into Obama and/or right-wing SDMB members aren’t original or witty enough to sustain a thread. Your jerkishness, however, is more than adequate. Had that thread not been locked at your request, I believe it would resemble this one, since a dopgile of you is where it was headed.

Yes, it was moved to the Pit unfortunately. I think that’s because Twickster isn’t very bright and thought I was making fun of St. Obama.

At what point will you, and the few remaining people trying to have a discussion with this guy, realize you’re just feeding his ego?

Come on, just let him go on talking to himself if he likes. You’re not helping anybody.

Sorry, are you under the impression I’m doing this to be helpful? When I want to be helpful, I’ll dig a well in some village in one of those loser countries. For now, mswas is just my current yarn-ball.

You’re the only one who gets it.

Well, joy to me.

My, my, how things go in on my absence! I wonder if they would keep going on in mswas’s absence?

Let’s see, how shall I restart the ball? Pitying mswas for his shortsighted and rather incorrect view of atheists as roving bands of thugs?

Mocking mswas for his martyr complex?

Riffing on mswas’s “everyone I’m mean to is a prick, and not because I’m a prick to them first oh no” attitude, and how it’s blatantly oblivious to the fact that the way he accumulates new critics is because people occasionally read posts other than the ones he addresses specifically to them?

Calling his mother a whore apropo of nothing to see whether he claims it’s true and I’m using it as a subtle (and serious!) attack on him?

So many possibilities! Any suggestions people? I don’t want to miss the chance to be an asshole to him, since it’s not like I’m going to be a “fuckhead” to him in every thread I find him in, despite his “pity me!” protests that everyone here is his dire and mortal enemy.

Be careful or soon you’ll have more posts in my pit thread than your own.