Different impression on the Wildfire**MM thread

Pit him, find out how he stands in regard, compared to you. Otherwise, kindly STFU.

What I’d like to know is how he found out so quickly. What’d he do, write some kind of vanity-search bot?

My thoughts exactly. And when he does, I’m gon’ kick rjung right in the balls.

I’d like to kick all three of them in the balls. OK, so John Corrado started the whole thing (in this thread anyway) with a little throw-away insult. But then elucidator and rjung had to jump into it like tag-team pro-wrestlers.

You know what? I don’t give a fuck about any of it and I find it mildly annoying that the three of you are pissing all over this thread.

I was about Chile.

I actually thought most people here would understand that

You know what? Fuck you. Fuck you for playing games and trying to make everyone guess at your meaning.

Yea, yea, yea, we’ve long since established that the date you posted is a date of significance in the history of Chile. So? You may as well start a pit thread title, “Blue” containing the word “Color”. Yea, blue’s a color. You got a fucking point, douche bag?

I got it right off, but then I can remember the Dark Years. Governments deposed, nuns raped and slaughtered, an archbishop murdered in the middle of his religious duties. Pinochet, Uguarte, Arenas and a whole cast of devoted Fascists with fists full of our money in their blood stained hands. Nobody cared, but us. Still don’t.

“Its our hemisphere, you people just pay rent.”

Keep your jealousy to your self, nut cup.

No fuck you

So the answer is “no”, then. You don’t have a point. You’re just throwing out random bits of trivia seeing what people’s reactions are. In other words, a troll.

Really? Where the fuck in a thread titled “Don’t forget September the 11th” with the sole word “1972” did you get that?

What I get is that you are reading your own political bias into a very simple non-descript and non-informative statement. How do you know Wildfire isn’t a Pinochet supporter? For that matter, how do you know he isn’t just yanking our chains by posting something inflammatory to see people get worked up? Because that’s what I see here. Of course, I don’t have message board ESP like you do, so maybe I’m mistaken.

Had to think about it a second. Didn’t take much.

Be nice if I had none. Like, for instance, you.

I don’t. Pretty good guess, since he was comparing Bad Thing to Bad Thing. Need me to break that down for you? Be happy to help.

Anything political is inflammatory to somebody. The simple fact that we are being led by a cabal of shitwits is held to be inflammatory by some people. Go figure.

If you have no such ESP, how come you know so much about his intentions? Unless, of course, you’re operating out of the political biases you haven’t got?

Starting a possible inflammatory thread in the pit? Say it aint so?

The thread was crap IMO but so what? It’s meaning was very obvious IMO and it’s placement in the pit confirmed that it was meant to be a dig.

It could have become a very interesting thread if let run it’s course. If it hadn’t have been a 9/11 thread it wouldn’t have been shut down from my experience of this board.

its FFS.

It’s going to take awhile to compile a comprehensive list of links. I’ll see what I can do.

This should pretty much sum it up. A Pit thread based on some goofy report from 1998 in which out dear poster(boy of idiocy) barged in with this gem

That was one of the most reasoned and intelligent posts he’s made on the subjuect. So that should tell you something right away. Really don’t see any need to search more posts since this one should give you a general idea of his stances.

My thoughts on seeing the locked thread was the idea that “not today,” was the response to the post about remembering the significance of the date in Chile, as if 364 other days of the year Americans are perfectly willing to have a frank and open discussion about the bullying role our government has played in world affairs.

“Think about it”. Really, what did you think about? The color of the sky in your world?

All that’s there is a date. Please, tell my how your great mind deduced Wildfire’s intent.

Oh, this is rich.

Tell me, oh Carnak the Magnificent, what exactly is my political bias? Go ahead, you shouldn’t need to think about it more than “about a second.”

Sure, it’s a long shot. But when all someone gives you is a date, how do you know? But if you feel the need to “break it down”, please go for it.

I’m sorry. Apparently I did not explain what I meant very well. Let me try again.

What if – and this is just a “what if”, I do not claim to be a mind reader – but what if Wildfire thought to himself, “Hmmm, how can I yank the chains of a bunch of Americans about this date? Let’s go look in Wiki and see what I can find. Hey, look at this, Allende was overthrown on this date in 1973. I’ll just post that date!”

Get the idea? Wildfire doesn’t “need” to care one way or another about Allende or Pinochet and the events in 1973, all that’s required is a troll finding an interesting date in the Wiki.

You just aren’t keeping up are you?

  1. I never claimed to have “no bias”. But you don’t have a fucking clue what my biases are. You seem to be doing the same thing with me that you are with Wildfire, although in the opposite direction. I am disagreeing with you, therefore I must be your enemy, therefore I must share the opposite opinion with you on all subjects. It just ain’t so.
  2. Because I dare to say that there are other possible interpretations of creating a thread consisting of a single date, you seem to think I automatically am showing my biases. Bullshit, my friend. What I’m showing is an ability to use reason and logic. I’m just throwing out the possibilities that I see – hell, there may be others I’ve overlooked.

So, try this again: How exactly is it that you know what Wildfire “meant to say” by simply posting a date?

Hey, yojimbo, I can take comments out of context, too! How’s this:

Hey, moron, this thread isn’t about baseball and the “Blacksox”, and I sure as hell ain’t Shoeless Joe.

I’ll explain it slowly to you, too:
A date is just a date. In this case, probably a reference to a specific historic event. It doesn’t say anything about that date, it doesn’t pass judgement about the event, it doesn’t fucking say anything! My purpose in illustrating other possible interpretations of the date, and thus the event, was merely to show that there are other possible interpretations. I am not, as you seem to think, outraged that someone is trying to stir shit. I am simply stating that such content-less OP’s as the one posted by Wildfire should indeed be closed.

I’m so not all over this baseball shit. Is that something I should know or even care about?

Can I use Micheal Ó Muircheartaigh references then :wink:

Actually I’ve just googled and found out what it’s about but I was just using a turn of phrase I had no idea it was linked to baseball.

Other than that your opinion obviously varies. You will notice that I didn’t post a post of support in the original thread. I did post in it however. It made perfect sense to me I have to say. It was lazy and useless but again, the posts that were coming in after the OP had some merit.

The OP was getting it in the neck. Why stop it?

Sorry if I came off a bit rude, yojimbo. As your post followed elucidator’s I guess I was still a bit worked up. To be honest, I’m not even vaguely a baseball fan; I guess when you live in the US you kind of absorb some of this stuff through osmosis. But if it makes you feel better, I had to google “Micheal Ó Muircheartaigh” … :slight_smile:

As to the subject at hand, we can agree to disagree and still be on friendly terms, I hope.

No problem whatsoever.