[QUOTE=WF Tomba]
I’ve noticed a lot of people seem to assume that if a marriage is likely to end in divorce, it’s better not to enter into it in the first place. (This point of view can be seen in the current threads about marrying young.) But I have known of married couples who achieve a few genuinely happy years together before the wheels fall off. In such cases, is it really reasonable to say that it would have been better for the marriage never to have occurred? On the other hand, some matches seem poisoned from the start.
Having never been married myself, I put it to you all: if you have been divorced, do you consider the whole marriage to have been a mistake?
[/QUOTE]
What is up with you? You have been straight up reading my mind lately. I read those ‘marrying young’ threads and had the exact same thought. Someone posted something to the effect that it didn’t work out, so they wish it had not happened, and all I could think is, if my husband and I broke up forever right now, I would not regret the years we had together.
I have a very close friend that had her husband’s name tattooed on her neck. I think that it is insane to tat a name on one’s neck, but that is not the point. The point is, she had no regrets about the tat while they were together, but now that he has left her, she regrets it and wants to cover it with a scorpian.
I tried to explain to her that she should go ahead keep the tat as is. Firstly, because covering it will end up being a sloppy job…she doesn’t have enough money to get it done by the kind of expert that could handle a cover job properly. But also because it symbolizes what she felt at the time that she had it done. She should not regret that…it was a pure intention. The marriage has dissolved, but the memories, the growing they did together, the children, and the tattoos…those have not dissolved.
