Do unclean living conditions contribute positively to immune systems?

I’m not the cleanest guy in the world (but nowhere near as bad as what I’ve seen on the 'tubes) and I often rationalize my lack of frequent cleaning by saying my body being exposed to unclean living conditions (I wouldn’t necessarily say I’m dirty–I do clean, just not as regularly as some would) only gives my immune system a positive boost. Compare this to say, those who wash their hands with triclosan 20 times a day.

Is my rationalization reasonable? Does exposing your body to dirtier living conditions give it a positive boost, or is it a case of diminishing returns? It seems like it would be a good thing up until a point where your body has detrimental health effects from too-dirty conditions…

There is a gray area but hyper-cleanliness is certainly bad in many circumstances especially for young children. The immune system needs to learn what to fight against and it can turn nasty if it doesn’t get the proper battles to fight. Here is one good article:

http://yourtotalhealth.ivillage.com/can-excessive-cleanliness-kill-you.html

The key to disease control is recognizing that germs reach you by riding on other people.
If you don’t want a cold, wash your hands after you shake hands with anyone. Being a slob does not expose you to measles or chickenpox germs, so it can’t protect you from them either.

As long as you’re cleaning germy messes (chicken juice on the counter, washing your hands after wiping, etc.), you should be more or less okay. One caveat: if you happen to have allergies, living in a dusty environment wouldn’t be the best idea. Dust is more than just settled dirt and can cause serious allergic reactions.

Eh? What’s in it?

According to wikipedia:

Dust in homes, offices, and other human environments consist primarily of human skin cells, but also contain small amounts of plant pollen, human and animal hairs, textile fibers, paper fibers, minerals from outdoor soil, and many other materials which may be found in the local environment.[1]

All sorts of things are in dust–mold spores, bits of skin, dust mites, animal dander, hair, the buggies that like to eat all that stuff…

I think the evidence is pretty inconclusive. Certainly I have known babies who lived in homes with cats who became very allergic to cats–in such cases, the constant exposure to the allergen aggravates the immune system and doesn’t strengthen it at all. Likewise, if you have asthma or a cough, living in lots of dust is very bad for you, and small children living in such environments seem more likely to have such problems.

Actually living in a very dusty environment is, I think, bad for most people; humans aren’t meant to live in such places. Until about 100 years ago, homes were routinely drafty–that is, they got lots of fresh air whether you liked it or not. The advent of wall-to-wall carpets and weather-tight homes made a big change in that way, and it seems we aren’t really built for it.

A strong, healthy person living in a dirty environment might well have great immunity. Invite a pregnant or elderly or very young person over, and serious illness may result. As you age, your system may weaken and what didn’t hurt you before might be bad.

There is a degree of balance between dirty and clean. People NEED to get exposed to germs to build immunity.

The classic example is polio. Researchers found when they studied it that certain “peoples” such as blacks, Latinos, and other minorities were getting polio a lot less than white people. And those minorities that got it, got it less severely. Now there are plenty of diseases which have a genetic element like this. For instance, sickle cell anemia occurs more often in African people.

But the researchers then discovered something else interesing regarding polio. The rich blacks, the rich Asians, the wealthy Latinos, and the well-off immigrants were getting polio at the same rate as whites, furthermore the poor white people were not getting polio and had the same ratio as the poor minorities.

So research started looking at “are the rich people buying or eating something, the poor people can’t afford?”

Long story short -> Turns out poor kids play in dirt. Well all kids love to play in dirt and mud, but the rich or middle class didn’t do it much and were cleaned up asap.

There is a germ that is commonly found in dirt. This germ is similar enough to polio to sort of “kick start” the immune system. Now this isn’t a case of like Cowpox providing immunity to Smallpox, what it is was that when a person is infected with polio by the time the body sees it and starts fighting it the virus is way ahead. This germ is similar to polio to activate an immune response so when polio virus invades, the body is like “Hmmmm, something’s up,” and immeidately starts to fight, so the polio doesn’t get a chance to take hold.

And that explained why these poorer kids who didn’t have exposure to clean areas to play in, or fancy playground, these kids that found their day’s entertainment in the mud, had a leg up over the fancy, clean rich kids.

So you see your immune system does need germs to keep it active. But there is a balancing act.

This is why vaccines in some cases no longer provide life long immunity in a lot of cases. In the old days, you got the mumps vaccine, let’s say. Since others had the mumps, you were constantly exposed to it, in very small does. Everytime your vaccinated body sees this tiny amount of mumps virus, it keeps up the immunity.

If 10 years go by and your vaccinated body hasn’t seen a mumps virus, 'cause everyone else is getting vaccinated too, the body says “Why should we expend energy keeping up immunity for mumps when we don’t see it. It can’t be a big threat.” Thus your immunity decreases