Do you edit URL’s before posting? Do you think people should?
For example, I always edit out anything which follows a question mark, like changing this:
To this:
(I removed the “?_twitter_impression=true” from the end of the link.)
I especially do this when posting a link to a searched thread when the “highlight” tag(?) is used, for nothing is more irritating than reading a cite where all instances of the same word are in bold-red.
Just wondering who among us is this anal, er, polite.
Definitely. There’s even a practical reason: that junk can include tracking information.
Though I do note simply removing everything after the ? is not always viable. You have to look at whether it looks important, and test the link to make sure it still works. It helps to know the anatomy of a URL–that the ? introduces options, each separated by &. So you can remove the unimportant options.
For example, Google Image searches need the q= part and the tbm=isch part (means Image search), and those must be separated by &. So a proper image search URL is https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=cecil+adams . I did not include the long tracking info.
I voted NO, because I’ve never noticed any issues with links that I’ve posted. I always click on them after I post to be sure they work, but I have not noticed any question marks or highlighted text anywhere. That said, I’m not certain I would notice question marks or highlighted text or think that would bother anyone.
I don’t edit unless it’s a Wikipedia link that gets screwed up for some reason. Parentheses in the link will do that sometimes. I preview my posts that have links in them. If the link takes me where I wanted it to go when I click on it, I assume it’ll work for everyone else and that’s good enough for me.
I almost always scrape off any extraneous info from links I post. Aside from the occasional tracking data it just annoys the hell out of my OCD subroutine.