All four have been called trolls many times. I only think one is a troll. If she is not a troll, she is at least a grade ‘A’ jerk with nothing to contribute.
The other 3 are good at pissing people off, indeed **VC ** & **DT ** have pissed me off, but they also contribute. **Valteron ** doesn’t seem to push my buttons, he pushes plenty of others though.
I was just making a point, that posters do survive the label of Troll.
I enjoy **DT ** posts in Café and sometimes I find myself agreeing with his anti-religious rants but wish he could tone them down a bit. It’s his wishing death on US serviceman that generally drives me nuts. But, I now ignore those posts. I beat my head against that wall enough times and neither of us is prepared to give an inch.
OTOH, maybe I’m getting too jaded: “aggressive troll” could just mean “really bad at trolling subtly because he’s not actually a troll”. Troll or big mouth? I know the same question has been asked of me, so I’ll be curious to see what the Pit consensus is.
I’d vote for you to stay if you were funny. Good trolls are funny or ironic or clever in some way. Just being obnoxious doesn’t really cut it. If you decide to be funny, though, I think you should stay. If not, meh. . .doesn’t matter to me.
I’m old. I’ve learned that very few things really matter and those that do matter, don’t matter very much. Your choice to stay or go doesn’t matter at all.