You get 242 views on a thread and only 5 people take the time to acknowledge your existence?
I know this has been brought up but hey its 1:10 in the morning and I’m bored 
I acknowledge your existence, can I go to bed now?
sure thing!!
Night night blueslady!! sleep tight!!
Talkinsquirrel…i’m thinking…should i just keep on viewing and re-viewing this thread…so the number of views keep on increasing…just to annoy ya…;)…nah!
Why do you assume it reflects badly on you or your thread that those people didn’t respond?
That wouldn’t be my first assumption.
My first assumption would be that I had crafted such a damn fine question/topic/thread that they had to go off and think about it!
[quote]
My first assumption would be that I had crafted such a damn fine question/topic/thread that they had to go off and think about it!
[quote]
Thats what i thought too!! but then i decided i wanted to be insecure cuz its a lot more fun 
If I could, I’d post twice without viewing, just for you Talkingsquirrel.
Wasn’t there a thread recently that was attempting to determine the optimum post/view ratio? Did they ever figure it out?
What I really want is for them to break the numbers down for us. How many unique viewers? Who looked 2,3, 4 or more times? Who started to reply but then decided that it sounded stupid and cleared it? What did they say? I need information, people!
OOO OOO here’s another thing I hate!!
Dont ya hate it when it take 3 minutes for a page to load!?!? Come on people just because I’m sitting down eating Salt & Vinegar Pringles have absolutley nothing to do, doesnt mean I’m not in a hurry!!
OOO OOO here’s another thing I hate!!
Dont ya hate it when it take 3 minutes for a page to load!?!? Come on people just because I’m sitting down eating Salt & Vinegar Pringles haveing absolutley nothing to do, doesnt mean I’m not in a hurry!!
And those double posts. Don’t you just hate those.
coughsmartasscough