[QUOTE=mswas]
. . . If you put a penis in a vagina and ejaculate on the correct day of the month you will likely produce an offspring. This act is pleasurable . . .
[/QUOTE]
Courtesy of the Dialectizer: Iff yuoo poot a penees in a fegeena und ijecoolete-a oon zee currect dey ooff zee munt yuoo veell leekely prudooce-a un ‘offspring’. Thees ect is pleesooreble. Bork bork bork!
[QUOTE=1010011010]
highway is a young lass who seems to have lost her shoe.
motorcycle is a lad showing off his cthulhu impression.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry–I’ve been searching for this one for hours. I’ve seen the other photos you mention. But could you link me to this one? I’ve never heard of it, and I’d like to view it.
[QUOTE=Zoggie]
Sorry–I’ve been searching for this one for hours. I’ve seen the other photos you mention. But could you link me to this one? I’ve never heard of it, and I’d like to view it.
[/QUOTE]
Not in this thread, he won’t. Sending it via email or PM, I don’t care, but do not post the link.
This seems like an ideal thread for MC Frontalot’s Pr0n S0ng:
(partial lyrics)
lurking in #pass chans on the irc
got dcc’d unexpectedly
with an 80-minute XviD: Nuns In Heat
Part Three, Bad Habits. I’m so l337
that I had that one already
skipped to the part with the fishnet teddy
whipped it out, but to my chagrin
one toss from a win and the boss walked in
said “nuh-uh Front, that terminal ain’t
for a latex crucifix spanking a taint
in big 32-bit color
while them rosary beads get yanked out the cruller”
I said “you can’t fire me; I quit!”
opened up the case, yanked out the hard disk
absconded, all with the data in hand:
31 years of Hustler scans
plans for how to construct a love-swing
alt.binaries.everything
archived since spring of '92
receipt for my RealDoll’s stripper shoes
tools for an online poll I ran:
vote once! tub girl or goatse man?
glands galore, explore for hours
diaper play and roman showers
glory hole video, deep as it gets
mpegs of an heiress that she ought regret
cap’d on cam from a hijacked feed
half a terabyte, so whatcha need?
got grannies in the front, trannies in the back
red on brown on blond on black
ganged up, tied up, all alone
every delectation to which I’m prone
[QUOTE=mswas]
Sorry, I didn’t invent biology. I have both given and taken it up the ass, but that doesn’t change how I view the biological functions of those organs.
[/QUOTE]
Well then you know we humans don’t always use them for their biological purpose. We just have too much imagination…and less of an estruse cycle… for that.
As I said, one of the beauties of being human.
[QUOTE=Zoggie]
Sorry–I’ve been searching for this one for hours. I’ve seen the other photos you mention. But could you link me to this one? I’ve never heard of it, and I’d like to view it.
[/QUOTE]
::raises hand:: I too haven’t seen either of those. PM though, not link as per Frank’s ruling.
Whoops, sorry about that. If you could e-mail it or PM it, that would be great, 1010011010.
[QUOTE=inquilinekea]
Interesting replies.
That said - could it be possible that homosexuals are less likely to be repulsed by goatse and lemonparty? Could some of them even find goatse and lemonparty arousing?
[/QUOTE]
Well, someone out there probably finds goatse and lemonparty arousing. I don’t know if “homosexual” would be the right term for that person, though.
this is pure speculation (since seeing either one makes me go “ewwwww”) but I always thought goatse and tubgirl and so on was supposed to be more shocking based on people not expecting to see it. I mean, I would think most of the time when people are watching porn, it’s intentionally and knowing what to expect.
Personally, the first time I saw goatse and tubgirl, I was told they were horribly shocking and gross and my reaction was “eh.” … but when I click a link and unexpectedly see ads with penises or something, my reaction is more like, “GAAAH! GROSS! I did NOT need to see that.”
[QUOTE=mswas]
Obviously porn is symbolic imagery designed to elicit a certain response, and that is purely cognitive, but what turns most people on is symbolic references to normal sexual activity. There is some broadening of that range to include sensual stimulus like homoerotica or oral sex. What comes out of our asses is filth, that is specifically toxic to our systems, so we want to expel it and get it away from us, most of society’s efforts have been based around removing the filth as far from us as we possibly can as soon as it leaves our asshole.
[/QUOTE]
“Some broadening,” eh? You have a gift for understatement. I would be challenged to find any currently-produced pornography that doesn’t include obligatory scenes of oral, or for that matter anal, sex. (I say “would” because naturally I don’t watch porn, have never seen it, and don’t even know what it is.)
It sounds to me like you’re trying hard to project your own sexual preferences and phobias onto the world at large. Unfortunately in this case, there is so much evidence to the contrary that I can say confidently that you are not only merely wrong… you are demonstrably, spectacularly, incredibly wrong.
Unless I’m wrong, and there are really just two greasy perverts in a basement somewhere with their Kleenex and Vaseline, supporting the entire world’s multibillion-dollar porn industry with its explicit treatment of all manner of extravaginal (“filthy”) sex practices…