We need to raise awareness of the effects of FSIS – Firefighter Smoke Inhalation Syndrome, caused by repeatedly entering burning buildings with an indadequately sealed breathing mask. You cannot imagine the toxins given off in a burning building. Just look what it’s done to this poor man!
I thought mug-shots were usually taken of the face and profile.
And I thought that I was the only one who bet on Ohio and lost…
That mons ain’t right.
[QUOTE=mamboman]
The guy was romping. It’s not as if he was rampaging, marauding or even galavanting. It was just a little romp. Where’s the harm?
[/QUOTE]
He might have been gavotting.
In all seriousness though, why indecent exposure? The outfit, while skimpy, is big enough to cover his parts. Did he strip all the way down at some point?
[QUOTE=Duck Duck Goose]
It’s because he was romping in front of children, and we can’t have that. The innocent darlings must never suspect that there are grown men who, for whatever reason, will put on a bikini and romp.
.
[/QUOTE]
Well, the allegations that he fondled himself in public, if proved, would certainly be something that most people would want the law to take seriously. Maybe that’s where the indecent exposure charge came from.
On the other hand, it could be a case of just seeing the guy in drag, not to mention something as skimpy as that, and therefore automatically assuming he was a child-endangering pervert. From DDG’s link it didn’t seem that he had a very clear view of the defendant, and that he “appeared” to be naked and fondling himself.
[QUOTE=Ferd Burfel]
Drunk is the only I’d ever be caught in an outfit like that.
[/QUOTE]
ferd, honey, there ain’t enough drunk in the *world * to make that outfit work… 
I think this guy has a serious case-for having his 1st amendment rights abridged! I think the ACLU should get involved-he should have the right to freedom of expression…on the other hand, shouldn’t he be charged with extremely BAD taste?
[QUOTE=ralph124c]
I think this guy has a serious case-for having his 1st amendment rights abridged! I think the ACLU should get involved-he should have the right to freedom of expression…on the other hand, shouldn’t he be charged with extremely BAD taste?
[/QUOTE]
Maybe police departments need a Fashion Squad to enforce good taste.
[QUOTE=Autolycus]
Giggity giggity giggity!
[/QUOTE]
Sooooo, do you have anything more to add Auto? :dubious: Maybe a confession? This sounds a bit like one of your exploits. 
sinjin
[QUOTE=Sunspace]
Is he …augmenting things in a couple of places?
[/QUOTE]
I think those might be man-boobs.
I dunno…say what you want about his fashion sense, but I think he’s got a nice butt.
[QUOTE=GrizzRich]
I thought mug-shots were usually taken of the face and profile.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe they needed (snerk, snort) the full-body shot (giggle, chuckle) for evidence at trial! Hey, that just inspired a song – here’s a peek at some of the lyrics:
"They asked me what I was arrested fer,
"I said dressin’ in a bikini in public,
"An’ they all moved away from me,
"An’ fondlin’ myself, I said,
“An’ they all moved back, and we had a great time, there on the Group W bench, talkin’ about dressin’ in a bikini, and father-rapin’ and mother-stabbin’ …”
[QUOTE=Kalhoun]
I dunno…say what you want about his fashion sense, but I think he’s got a nice butt.
[/QUOTE]
I was gonna say that. Seriously, the guy may have bad taste but he’s got a sweet ass. So, in my opinion - he’s one up on most men I’ve ever met.
Why does the articles say it was a blue bikini? It’s also a red and white bikini.
[QUOTE=Spectre of Pithecanthropus]
[/quote]
Or cavorting or disporting.
At least he wasn’t gamboling. The penalties for illegal gamboling are pretty severe.
[QUOTE=Phase42]
Why does the articles say it was a blue bikini? It’s also a red and white bikini.
[/QUOTE]
See, that was his mistake. It should have had polka dots. Then everything would have been okay.