Spotted this article, tagline “Britain’s Worst Dad”, and after reading it I understood why. My mind has been boggled yet again:
Real classy move. Guess what he did after abandoning his baby in the car wreck? Return to the scene to see if his baby was still alive? No, went for a sleep.
This guy doesn’t deserve to be a father. For this, they should revoke his drivers licence permenantly, before he gets someone killed.
And he only gets FOUR MONTHS?? Holy shit. “Britain’s Most Undeservedly Lenient Sentence.”
From the movie Parenthood
“You need a license to drive, you need a license to buy a dog, hell, you need a license to fish, but they’ll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father…”
And what was the kid doing in the FRONT SEAT??? Not even on the seat, in the “footwell”, which I guess is British for “floor”.
Holy Jebus, what a fucktard.
What is my dad doing in Britain? And when did i get a brother?
That’s no “dad,” that’s a giant asshole with legs.
And where’s the mother?
Well put.
What was his baby doing in the front seat? Either it was buckled in there or it somehow ended up there, and neither is good.
Probably he put the baby there, beause he is too much of a choadbiscuit to own a infant’s car seat, and wished to conceal this lack from others. If you don’t have the baby in the seat, you get a ticket, at the least.
I was going to start this thread too. What a motherfucking arsehole. What a prick. What a fucking cunting fucking bastard. I cannot believe he only got four months. What the fuck are the judiciary playing at?
My emphases. What a shambles, and what a fucking cunting fucking bastard.
I cannot believe the courts let him get away with just a slap on the hand. Anyone know if they gave the baby BACK?
Sky:
“Graeme Kershaw, 24, was twice over the limit when his car careered off the road while being followed by police.”
The Guardian:
“A pursuit ended when** Kershaw’s car hit another car.** He fled the scene, leaving the engine running.”
. . . Just reminds me that unless you are there,* actually in the court room*, you have no idea of what unfolds. For example; sure he was well drunk but you don’t know the mans circumstances at that time (medical condition, mental condition, etc), his degree of contrition since, the likelihood of him re-offending . . .nuffin’.
And, in all honesty, in the legal sense, the child is irrelevant. He was a drink-driver driving carelessly and with no insurance: “Charges of dangerous driving and child cruelty were dropped.”
In any event, the media can’t even report the same facts for the same story so I’m not sure we have a sound basis on which to make judgements.