Okay, I guess I haven’t been clear enough about what I mean. I’m asking about a specific phenomena with relatively narrow boundaries. Sorry if this seems like moving the goal posts or anything like that - it isn’t meant to be.
Son of Sam attacked average type people in a fairly easily defined, relatively small area. In his case there were survivors in almost every case; which allowed for the story to spread. Bodies weren’t dumped and were soon found.
Hill-side Strangler - Again, a relatively small hunting ground, again people who weren’t expendable, again the public knew that there was someone operating in the area and that “good people” weren’t safe. It was the media that gave them the name. Bodies were dumped but not really concealed.
Zodiac - same pattern as Son of Sam but fewer survivors.
Contrast with:
Ted Bundy - Keeps with the pattern in that the victims were “good people”. Breaks the pattern in that the killing ground considerably more spread out and the media [therefore the public] didn’t know that there was one assailant behind all the missing people. 30 people over 7 states over 4 years with no discernible connection other than raped and strangled. I’d bet a non-insignificant number of female murder victims are strangled. I’ve known two personally. No one killer, no name to attach, no reason to think they weren’t random events until his arrest.
Green River Killer - A decent sized range, connections were made early on and a name given but the victims were disposable people - prostitutes and drug addicts. Non prostitutes and non-drug addicts don’t care what happen to prostitutes and drug addicts and so no public fear.
Robert Pickton - Small hunting ground but it was the slum of Vancouver again the victims were prostitutes and drug addicts. A disappearance or murder of someone in East Hastings would not be noticed or remarked upon by “good people.” Bodies were buried on site. Media did not publicize the connections if they were aware of them, no need for public alarm.
I am asking specifically about the economic effect of the Son of Sam category; anyone can be a victim, easily defined territory, public awareness of “a monster”
Picunurse I’m glad that your roommate’s sister survived but…ummmm… not really relevant. She got the sense that something was off but wasn’t aware that she was in the presence of a serial killer until AFTER the fact. Was she aware at the time that there was a serial killer active in the area?
Ted Bundy wasn’t in the news weekly until his arrest. I wonder how many after-the-fact near-victims appeared once he was arrested.
I am unaware of a general realization at the time that there was a single person kidnapping and killing coeds. I repeat; 30 dead in 4 years in 7 states.
Gary Ridgeway wasn’t in the news weekly until he was caught. There were brief mentions as each victim was found but since they were disposable no one cared (except* Unsolved Mysteries* which is where I first heard about the Green River Killer.)