Ed, at some point you'll need to quell the rebellion.

:smiley:

Glad I could be here for you.

I think I know where he’s stored that apple…

Ah, the gentle osculatory lapping of raindog’s lips on Ed’s buttocks: like waves caressing the shore they are, gentle and soothing, lulling one into a profund and dreamless sense of oneness with the desire to shove an office stapler up his arse, business end first.

Ed, I’m pleased to announce a breakthrough that Miller and I have stumbled upon.

It appears that the **"pretty much all "**of the Dopers “are in agreement with the spirit and principle of the new rule and simply want it refined.”

The Dopers are in what appears to be unanimous agreement that name calling etc should stop and eagerly await your clarification.

Thanks Miller.

I got a string. (channeling happy Hocky family)

See now, this is much better.

A little over-ambitious and hard on the palate. (if you know what I mean…)

A scribe like you should be part of the new and improved Pit.

So when are you gonna pony up the 15 bucks, or do I need to sponsor you?

Is this the Raindog Recruitment Drive? Has he been tasked with weeding out the less urbane denizens of The Pit? If so, I may as well fuck off now.*

  • But I wont. I’ve got until June before my money runs out.

Aw stick around.

Where else would you have this much fun?

I like the old Pit, thanks very much: the rapier is all very well, but sometimes you’ve just gotta reach for the bludgeon and call a lickspittle toady a sycophantic cunt, you sycophantic cunt. And don’t fucking patronise me.

raindog, speaking as someone who is (I hope) entering into constructive dialogue with Ed back in ATMB, I would like to say that you’re an oleaginous tit, and are achieving nothing here save the unjustified inflation of your own ego.

It never ceases to amaze me that on this, a messageboard whose users come here to talk about stuff that interests them, people are sometimes surprised that when something interests the users, they like to talk about it. Although I suppose there’s always one nobber in every thread who likes to pronounce his deep distaste for everyone else’s interest, so it’s proably just as silly of me to be surprised by raindog. His ludicrous quest to shut down discussion is as crushingly inevitable as a hooker’s herpes outbreaks.

This is precisely the problem with the new “Rule No. 2”. There is no consistency to its enforcement; there is no way to know ahead of time what is and is not permissible. TBTB have offered little or no coherent guideline about what specifically can not be said, and there is really no way for them to do so.

Isn’t it pathetically amusing how people are compelled to parenthetically end their Pit posts with “(Am I allowed to say that?”)? Some are just jokes, sure, but many are serious. Is this the way it’s going to be now? What a fucking mess. What a lot of extra bits 'n bytes for the hamsters to suck on (can I say that?).

You really don’t seem to understand, raindog, that the above issue is what people are complaining about–NOT the fact that I can’t call you a cunt anymore (ahhhh… the good old days–when you could call a cunt a cunt!).

Now, I can only suggest that you are a knobgobbler (is that allowed?)*.

  • It can hardly be considered “abuse” as many people enjoy gobbling knobs. But see how tiring this becomes? Asking for permission to write things on a message board?

So I assume your passion for the Pit includes supporting it with your hard earned money?

You know, this board supposedly has a copious share of the highly intelligent, and such people should have extensive vocabularies. Just because the ubermod says you shouldn’t use certain words doesn’t mean you can’t communicate effectively.

Case in point: Duke basketball fans are known for being insidiously creative for fucking with the heads of the opposing team and coming up with cheers and chants that are worthy of Pulitzers. They still resort to utter crassness when the occasion calls for it, and in one game they got out of hand. Coach K got on the mike and asked them to tone down the language.

So on the next call the ref blew, instead of yelling “BULLSHIT,” they yelled “WE BEG TO DIFFER! WE BEG TO DIFFER!”

So there’s plenty of ways to bust somebody’s nuts without using the C word. Take this as a challenge. See how the OP pissed so many people off by calling them unemployed bums? And this was done with rated G words.

The problem though, with calling raindog a cunt, even if we WERE allowed to, is that cunts are actually useful.

Listen. I appove of what Ed is trying to do – reduce the rancor and name calling, and as a side benefit, keep more threads on the rails.

But he’s chosen a list of BAD WORDS that won’t be tolerated, and that is not a good choice. Most folks here understand that.

I am probably in a minority in thinkng that the “don’t be a jerk” rule should be enforced more aggressively, and it would achieve the same ends without a thousand posts asking, “Is THIS phrase acceptable?”

The best way to handle the protest over the deballsing of the Pit is to stage a peaceful protest.

I have in mind a procession to the Straight Dope headquarters in Chicago, led by the saintly Father Fenris. Participants will carry banners with positive messages like “We Love Ed”, “Ed, We Beseech Thee For Redress” and “Straight Dope Chicago Is NOT Moribund”. All marchers will be carefully checked to make sure they are not carrying snark and invective.

The march will culminate with an anticipated speech and blessing by Cecil Himself, after which His Praetorian Guard will distribute snacks and condoms.

Let’s see - my calendar is open for a week from Sunday.

Trust me, it’ll go down in SDMB history as Groovy Sunday.

In all seriousness, this is the stuff that made The Pit a playground for children.

Clearly you and I disagree, vehemently. Rather than showing some modicum of maturity and self control, you spew this jibberish.

Save the logic, I’ve heard it before: raindog made me so mad, and I can’t be expected to act like an adult.

Ed’s got his work cut out for him. I don’t know if there is a grace period or if the new rules take effect March 1 or what. But clearly a line must be drawn, and if this kind of witless, banal trash is acceptable then there should be no new rules.

The word is gibberish, and it doesn’t mean what you think it means.

And you are a sycophantic cunt.

So tell me, was there a lot of consistency and way to know ahead of time what was and was not permissible with “Don’t be a jerk.”?

Yeah, he could said we are actually enforcing “Don’t be a jerk.” a bit tighter and made it clear that he considers inane gratuitous vulgarity aimed at fellow posters to be a bit on the jerkish side. There would probably have still been some :rolleyes: about but maybe not this overly-dramatic gnashing of the teeth.

Fuck you