I’m going to try and expand on what I’ve said and then leave this topic alone.
Re: The US and moral standards - The US impresses it’s ethical beliefs on other countries on a daily basis, and rightfully so. Whether you believe that the US has the right to do so or not, you should grant that, oftentimes, it has the obligation.
Let’s take the examples of female mutilation, asian foot binding, and the wearing of neck rings to make the neck look longer.
In all of these examples, it was eventually shown to the practitioners to be harmful. Since, the practices have dwindled. Was it some sort of “westernization” that effected this change? I think so. Did the victims believe they were being victimized? Not until they were shown that actual damage was being done.
Unfortunately, sexual abuse doesn’t always leave physical evidence.
Re: Whether what Abuela Quintana did was a sexual act. - Exposing a little boy’s genitals is, by definition, a sexual act. Otherwise, why couldn’t she have asked how much his feet had grown or how big his biceps were? Why the penis? Would anything similar have been done to a little girl? Doubtful.
Cuban society is considerably more “macho” than the US. Manhood is more strongly defined and defended. If anything, this would tend to make her act more humiliating, although a 6-year old might not see it that way, yet.
So, at what age does it become not ok to expose a child’s genitals? When he’s old enough to fight back? Doesn’t that imply that it’s an act only performed on a defenseless child?
Was Elian unwilling to have his pants unzipped? Probably. It’s embarrassing. Would the grandmother have gone further if there hadn’t been someone supervising the encounter? We can’t know. If she had, though, would that have been abuse? You decide.
And, wedgies and de-pantsing are humiliating, and shouldn’t be done to a child either. They’re both an attack on someone’s self-esteem, part of which is grounded in the person’s sexuality.
Somewhere along the continuum you have to go from “that’s ok” to “that’s wrong.” I think what she did was wrong. Look at it this way…would you allow a child of yours to be subjected to the same treatment, even if grandma was from the old country (wherever)? Why not? Are your morals beliefs superior to grandma’s?
If you find my moral beliefs parochial, so be it. I’m comfortable with them. And unless you’re willing to have Elian’s grandmother inspect your son, then I’d say you’re being hypocritical.
Re: Cannibalism - I’ve also read that, besides slaughtered enemies, they also consumed parts of their “honored dead” (chieftans, shamans). That’s how the brain disease kuru is passed on.
In sum, if I believe what I’ve heard and read about the environment in Cuba, then I have to believe that Elian would be better off here.