[QUOTE=Miller]
I’m not sure how to go about injecting a woman with gay. I know how to inject a man with gay, but if I tried the same thing with a woman, somehow it just doesn’t seem very gay to me.
[/QUOTE]
Well, we could try it. Then I could be more gay, and you could be less gay, and maybe we could just get Semi-Super Rights.
And anyway, if gay people really had Super Rights, wouldn’t they insist on calling them “Fabulous Rights”?
One must wonder about these things (especially when one has enjoyed several bottles of beer this very afternoon. . .)
[QUOTE=Miller]
I’m not sure how to go about injecting a woman with gay. I know how to inject a man with gay, but if I tried the same thing with a woman, somehow it just doesn’t seem very gay to me.
[/QUOTE]
It’s often said that men can turn most anything a woman says into something sexual, but norinew is giving us material that is just far too easy. This is Adolescent Boy 101.
I refused to read past the first paragraph where he states his “empirical facts”.
It became pure fiction at that point and why bother reading someones made-up hypothesis.
I refused to read past the first paragraph where he states his “empirical facts”.
It became pure fiction at that point and why bother reading someones made-up hypothesis.
[/QUOTE]
(emphasis mine)
…so that the two pages of jokes immediately following it make more sense?
[QUOTE=Annie-Xmas]
I e-mailed this to my sister the lesbian. She called me on my cell phone and screamed “How the fuck would HE know?”
[/QUOTE]
How else could he explain the number of women he dated who, after a date or two, suddenly couldn’t see him anymore because, uhh, err, they had suddenly become lesbians.
[QUOTE=Lightray]
Dude. If you’re dying while sticking it to the man, then you’re doing it wrong.
[/QUOTE]
Literally, yes, but dying in a metaphorical sense when “sticking it to the man” is to be expected.
[QUOTE=mswas]
They are just mad that their political party is demonstrably run by faggots.*
*Log Cabin Republicans
[/QUOTE]
The whole Republican party has to be completely infiltrated. Look at the Administration. Look at the current crop of candidates. If that isn’t a plot to discredit the ability of straight white males to run the country, then I don’t know what it is.
[QUOTE=norinew]
. . . And anyway, if gay people really had Super Rights, wouldn’t they insist on calling them “Fabulous Rights”? . . . .
[/QUOTE]
No, because, if the answer to this is yes, we gays are now allowed to name our rights what *we * want to name them.
[QUOTE=Voyager]
The whole Republican party** has to be completely infiltrated** (emphasis mine). Look at the Administration. Look at the current crop of candidates. If that isn’t a plot to discredit the ability of straight white males to run the country, then I don’t know what it is.
[/QUOTE]
The jokes write themselves. Dude(?), are you playing straight man here?
[QUOTE=Mighty_Girl]
Is this supposed to scare me into remaining heterosexual?
[/QUOTE]
No of course not. With a username like that you should be the poster child for our super rights.
Just that pesky little detail about becoming gay first. I promise that it won’t hurt a bit.
[QUOTE=norinew]
Yeah, if you can get anyone to tell you how to accomplish that. :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]
Easy-peasy! Just close your eyes, click the heels of your red ruby slippers and repeat, “There’s no place like home. There’s no place like home. There’s no place like home…”
[QUOTE=stolichnaya]
Remember folks, with “Super” rights comes “Super” responsibility.
[/QUOTE]
I keep thinking of that one Warner Brothers cartoon where Wile E. Coyote tries to defeat Bugs Bunny? The one where he ostentatiously builds a door in front of Bugs’ rabbit hole solely in order to knock, and when Bugs answers, he presents his card and introduces himself in an excessively precise, erudite manner? “Wile E. Coyote: Suuuuper-Genius!”
knock-knock “Allow me to introduce myself. I am Home O. Sexual, here to exercise my Suuuuper-Rights!”
[QUOTE=Antinor01]
No of course not. With a username like that you should be the poster child for our super rights.
Just that pesky little detail about becoming gay first. I promise that it won’t hurt a bit.
[/QUOTE]
Do you guarantee ‘sheer sexual pleasure’, super rights and whimsical condos? I want it in writing before I sign up.
[QUOTE=EddyTeddyFreddy]
Easy-peasy! Just close your eyes, click the heels of your red ruby slippers and repeat, “There’s no place like home. There’s no place like home. There’s no place like home…”
[/QUOTE]
Close, it’s “there’s nothing like homo, there’s nothing like homo…”
[QUOTE=tdn] Linky
Wow. It gets even better. Basically, Cameron claims that gays have a shorter life expectancy than heteros. He cites the Banks study, which states that any (minor) shorter life expectancy is caused by… Class, want to take a stab at it?
Yep! Homophobia!
But Banks also cites another study that claims a vast difference in life expectancy. Banks calls that study “flawed.” Who was the author of that study? Class? Anyone? Anyone?
Yep! Cameron!
So basically this guy posted a bunch of homophobic crap to the 'Net, then did a vanity search and used the results as his cites, without even reading the results. Putz.
[/QUOTE]
Paul Cameron is (in)famous for his shoddy and unethical research techiques, by supporting his position by selectively citing his own papers (which are based on shoddy techniques, etc.). See this article from the New Republic, or this UC Davis professor’s bitchsmacking of him. Basically, he exhibits all the traits of many “Christian” organizations like the Eagle Forum and the Family Research Council–pathological dishonesty and blatant igoring of the facts driven by hatred of homosexuals and homosexuality.
