As much as I personally am enjoying the hijacks, especially the Johnny L.A.-themed ones…
sorry Harimad-sol, didnt mean to hijack - have still been reading the thread AND enjoying it - honestly…!
Just by way of a contribution, Im in the ‘nice girl’ camp. The problem is with differentiating between the two, we’re sort of making moral judgements arent we?
Notice we dont say bad girls and good girls? We say bad girls and nice girls, - implying that to be a nice girl is good?
So what do we mean by ‘nice’?
You may find a girl who doesnt sleep around but who is an absolute cow! Is she a ‘nice girl’? You may also find a girl who seems to have had more than her fair share of sexual partners, but is actually a really ‘nice’ person - is she a ‘bad girl’?
One of the earlier posts made the comment that bad girls are those men go out with (putting it VERY politely), nice girls are those men settle down with! If thats the case, if there were NO ‘bad girls’, men would have a pretty boring time in the lead up to finding their ‘nice girl’ wouldnt they? In reverse, if there were no ‘nice girls’ would men then choose from the ‘bad girls’ after all?
Personally? I dont think its really about bad girl or nice girl, or bad guy or nice guy either. I think its down to attraction - literally. Sometimes its an instant thing, sometimes its something that develops, sometimes it only ever gets to a first stage, sometimes its a full blown relationship and you dont even know where it started or how it all came about.
Theres no doubt that men SEEM to be attracted to ‘bad girls’ for ‘fun’ , but surprisingly enough, I think its often the case that the ‘nice girls’ would be JUST AS MUCH if not MORE fun - if men just took a moment to realise that maybe - under the nice exterior (the one on display?) the ‘nice girl’ could very well be the raunchiest woman in the place - and probably is!
imho