No, what they said was “I have trouble as seeing her as a woman because of X,Y,Z.” All of them said “she.” If they had said “he isn’t a woman, he’s a man!” then I would have certainly had a problem with it.
I think the biggest problem with the LGBT brigade is that they can get this attitude of “You are either for or against us.” They turn the world into a black and white issue where if you don’t give full acceptance then you hate us. I think that’s a horrible stance to take because it distances possible allies, especially when it comes to trans issues. Most people just don’t get transsexuals. They think it’s strange, they think it’s creepy, they have trouble accepting it. But that doesn’t make them bigots. That doesn’t make their comments hate filled when they said that they have difficulty seeing someone as their preferred gender.
My parents are strongly Conservative Catholic. They think gays sex is a sin. I have a lot of other friends that are religious and don’t accept homosexuality. While I wish that they would vote for gay marriage so that I can marry a girl if that’s who I end up with, I respect their difference of opinion. They aren’t hate filled because they vote against gay marriage. They aren’t hate filled for having trouble with accepting gays in the first place. There is a HUGE difference between a person who says “I’m sorry, I met your ex-boyfriend as a guy and I just can’t see him as a girl right now.” and one who says “Trannies are sick, disgusting freaks!”
Trans people require scruntiny while gay people don’t because transition involves physical changes. You can’t get SRS just because you want it, and that’s the way it should be. There should be a system in place that fully weeds out the confused and deranged, but the system isn’t working correctly at this time, mostly because of the lack of information out there about transpeople. If you think you are gay and you have sex with a man, so what? If you think you are a woman and get SRS then you’re fucked.
I’m NOT saying that average people should challenge the gender identity of every trans person they meet. I’m not even saying that people should challenge the gender identity of trans.
let me turn it into examples.
Okay : “I have trouble seeing X as a woman because she acts like a drag queen while in female mode.”
Not okay: “X is not a woman because she acts like a drag queen while in female mode.”
People did the first, but not the second. I think that it allienates possible allies when we get all offended at the first question, dig in our heels and say “She’s a woman because she said so!”
I’ve found it works much better to say:
“Because of our society, a lot of trans people deny their status and try to be another things - gay men, transvestites, crossdressers, etc. Since she was a drag queen for so long, she has picked up those manurisms and is having trouble being herself. As time passes, she will get comfortable in her own skin and probably behave in a more womanly fashion.”
I just think that it harms the ts community when we accept, without question, every single person who claims to be trans. And it further harms our efforts when we demand that cisgendered people accept others as trans without question. I am reminded of a thread on this board concerning an individual from New York. This person wanted to use the women’s restroom. She said she didn’t plan on getting SRS, she wasn’t on any hormones, and she wasn’t dressing as a woman. I don’t think it was hatefilled, prejudiced, or bigoted for women to be uncomfortable with her using the restroom. Hell, I would have been uncomfortable with her using the restroom!