Epstein Files => Trump Impeachment & Conviction?

He’s in all kinds of trouble.

But Wexler also has a Congressional subpoena in regards to his involvement with Epstein.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform voted in early January to subpoena Wexner, 88, of the Columbus suburb of New Albany, to testify about his ties to disgraced financier Epstein.

When contacted about the subpoena in January, a legal representative for Wexner said he’ll cooperate fully with any governmental inquiry into Epstein, just as he did regarding the U.S. Attorney’s investigation into Epstein in which Wexner was told that he was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect.

He is reportedly the richest man in Ohio, and almost 90. I doubt he’d ever see the inside of a cell.

Remember the rules for Dinocon- "allegedly engaged in correspondence after his first conviction”
IIRC in the Epstein files there was something to extent of “Bill called me about”, so lets say some Con staff member is named William- someone alleges he is the “Bill” in that mention. We all know that is unlikely, we can make a good guess as to which “Bill” Epstein he meant. But it doesnt matter. Even if proven false. There is an Allegation it was William- thus he is banned. Then lets take some guy who sends Epstein “I hope you rot in hell!!”- he would be banned. And anyone who associated with them- banned.

And Dinocon isnt banning people for “voluntarily associating” they are banning people for Allegedly Corresponding or associating with anyone who allegedly corresponded.

I also read one of the Dinocon staffers has a beef with Horner- maybe this is all a personal issue? In any case, it is just virtue signalling at best.

You understand that the wording in a press release is not legally binding, right?

BRB while I email DinoCon’s PR team to ask if it’s their policy that anyone named William is banned.

Can you show us an example of such an email?

I have a beef with Horner. It’s that he willingly associated himself with a known pedophile.

“If you’re OK with pedophiles, you’re not welcome here” is a damn fine virtue to signal and I encourage more organizations to do so.

Am I being paranoid?

I see at The Hill this morning that Ro Khanna read the names of six implicated perpetrators into the Congressional Record. Good.

But the article doesn’t say who they are. Coverup? Afraid of lawsuits? But surely, reporting factually on what a member of Congress said can’t be libel or slander, can it?

What’s going on here?

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5731909-khanna-epstein-files-house-floor/

If this is the state of journalism, we’re screwed. (I know, where have I been).

ETA: I found other reporting that lists the names. But still…

Probably because The Hill has a distinct rightward slant to its news coverage. I don’t think it’s as bad as Faux News, but’s there.

Per Al Jazeera:

Les Wexner
Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem
Salvatore Nuara
Zurab Mikeladze
Leonic Leonov
Nicola Caputo

Looking through the list of suspected accomplices, there’s quite a few Georgian sounding last names.

Georgian Surnames - Common Last Names in Georgian History - MyHeritage Wiki).

I’d take it that he was sourcing girls from that region.

Researching news from that general region, the media appears to be saying that Epstein may have been influencing Thorbjørn Jagland, the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, to reduce oversight of civil rights in the realm of Georgia, the Caucasus, and Azerbaijan. (Maybe just to procure his own girls - it’s not clear to me.)

Epstein also, apparently, tried to set up a meeting with Putin through Jagland.

The whole former-Soviet sphere was reportedly hyoooge in CSAM and sex trafficking (adult and not) activity in the start of this century.

The inclusion of a name in the files does not imply wrongdoing by that person. However, the Justice Department’s handling of the release of the files – which advocacy groups and Epstein’s accusers said are far too heavily redacted – has come under fire.

and see that is the problem- some men are named that really had no business with Epsteins criminal activities, but they are all tarred with the same brush.

More news-
https://www.npr.org/2026/02/11/nx-s1-5707280/pam-bondi-oversight-hearing-department-of-justice

“You’re not showing a lot of interest in the victims, Madam Attorney General, whether it’s Epstein’s human trafficking ring or the homicidal governmental violence against citizens in Minneapolis,” Raskin said, in reference to the two fatal shootings of U.S. citizens by immigration officers in the city last month. “You’re siding with the perpetrators, and you’re ignoring the victims,” he added. “That will be your legacy unless you act quickly to change course.”…Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who has largely broken with his party in criticizing the administration on the issue, demanded accountability for sharing survivor information while “over redacting” potentially incriminating information.

There’s such a thing as a false dichotomy.

Person A might say that, if anyone ever passed Jeffrey Epstein on the sidewalk without cursing him out and whooping his ass then - whether they had any reasonable opportunity to know who Epstein even was or not - we should ostracize and blacklist those people from any social activity just for their failure to omnisciently shun the man.

Person A is, of course, an idiot. But the wrong way to point that out is to come in and say something like that, “Short of the Supreme Court validating a criminal case against someone who provably molested children, on Epstein’s Island, we should never speak ill nor doubt the complete chastity of all who knew the man.”

The only answer always is somewhere in the nebulous middle.

It’s not as fun, but the world’s gotten too good at running politics on fun in recent times.

Dr. Oz invited Epstein to a Valentine’s Day party in 2018.

Sure, as long as there are strong allegations- at least- that that person participated in molesting underage girls on that Island, and etc.

Not for people that just hopped a free jet ride, or asked for a donation, or worked at any companies Epstein worked at , or delivered pizza, or whatever.

…with a convicted child molester.

… from a convicted child molester.

…where their boss was a convicted child molester.

I worked in a non-profit with a convicted Murderer. He did his time, and I had no issues working there with him, and in fact a good number of the volunteers had criminal records. Good on them to try to make good by volunteering.

And did he own a private island where he held murder parties with wealthy elites?

Did you know that loads and loads of sex criminals “do their time”, then spend the rest of their lives having to register where they live and stay away from schools, children, etc? Sex crimes can carry a lifetime of penalties, for good reason, after getting out of prison.

Here’s the thing, DrDeth.

Murder, obviously, is bad. It’s one of the worst things you can do to a person. But at least, once a person’s life has been taken from them, their suffering is over.

Rape is morally worse than murder, because the victim’s suffering never ends. That person is going to spend the rest of their life living with feelings of inadequacy, failure, lack of worth, guilt, self-loathing, fear and distrust of authority, and difficulty trusting or opening up to anyone, because their autonomy was violently taken from them in the most intimate way possible. When that victim is a child, it’s worse yet, because they’re being victimized by a person society and every living experience they’ve ever had has told them they’re supposed to be able to trust and be safe around, and they haven’t even developed a mature understanding of their own bodies and the nature of human sexuality. And when that victimized doesn’t just rape a child, but prostitutes them and sells them to other men for his own personal gain - that’s just about one of the most morally repugnant things a human being can do.

Epstein didn’t just do that to one girl. He didn’t just do it to the 36 credible victims the state of Florida knew of when he plead guilty to procuring a child for prostitution in 2008. He did it to at least twelve hundred girls.

Murder doesn’t necessarily make someone a bad person. Sometimes it’s morally ambiguous. Sometimes, criminal homicide can even be morally justifiable. There is never a justifiable reason to rape someone. And when that someone is twelve hundred children? Jeffrey Epstein was, without hyperbole, one of the most evil men to ever live. People like him don’t deserve to be part of our society.

And what Epstein was doing wasn’t a secret. Literally thousands of people knew about it. He didn’t make much effort to hide it. The people who circled around him celebrated him for it, because those people are also evil. They believed that having money and power meant the rules and laws and morals that apply to us mere mortals were optional for them. It was impossible to spend any amount of time in Epstein’s orbit and NOT know he was trafficking children.

Anyone who willingly associated themselves with him after 2008 knew what he had done and what he was still doing. Some of them were indifferent. Some of them were OK with it. Some of them were active participants. ALL of them were morally bankrupt and complicit in the evil deeds he committed, either by omission or commission. There is no excuse for knowing Epstein was a pedophile and still being his friend, or being willing to accept money from him, or working for him. Those people can all go straight to hell as far as I’m concerned. I wouldn’t want anything to do with them and I wouldn’t want to be part of any organization that also includes them.

If someone told me they were friends with a convicted murderer, I’d assume that that person’s friend had changed their ways. If someone told me they were friends with a convicted pedophile, I wouldn’t talk to that person anymore.

Bravo!

So, you Google each person that you’re going to meet, just to make sure that they haven’t been indicted for child molestation since the last time that you met?

This is your, and you believe everyone’s, SOP?

Not all murderers enjoy killing. There are a multitude of reasons why one person would kill another, some more understandable than others.

ALL child rapists enjoy raping children. Otherwise they wouldn’t do it.