IMO, this is where you abandoned logic. If you’re going to debate, this is not a good thing.
However, in the spirit of suffering fools . . .
So this jackass insulted our dear dear friend, and we know our dear dear friend isn’t the kind to drag people to the pit for a thorough spanking, so we’re doing it for him. But if you had been here long enough and read some of the threads Polycarp’s posted in (and been insulted in), you’d know that.
And he is making this “point” in an insulting manner, which is both uncalled-for and not allowed in GD. For example:
“He selectively chooses those areas of christianty that suit him best and adopts these. Any aspect of christianity that would otherwise impede his normal everyday life are discounted as silly and old-fashioned.”
This is an insult.
“In other words, he does the bare minimum in order for him to get to heaven.”
This is also an insult.
“I respect the fundamentalist christians a whole lot more than the fence-straddlers (hereafter referred to as the polycarps) who only subscribe to certain christian beliefs and claim to be christian. At least the fundamentalists have enough guts to devote their lives to an ideal. The polycarps, on the other hand, realize all the shortcomings of christianity, but for some silly (cowardly?) reason, still adhere to some christian teachings, probably out of fear of going to hell.”
This is several insults.
Get the picture, or should I break it down into small words and spoon-feed it to you so that the shit-encrusted stump you mistakenly call a brain can begin this process (long and laborious for you, I’m sure) called comprehension?
Cite/link? A thread, a post, a sentence, even? If you’re going to say something, back it the fuck up, dipshit.
[crowd chant]
Buuuuulll-shiiiiiittttt.
Buuuuulll-shiiiiiittttt.
Buuuuulll-shiiiiiittttt.
[/crowd chant]
It is pointedly offensive to accuse someone of having religious beliefs for the express purpose of “making life easier” rather than accepting or entertaining those more difficult to follow but that will allow for a closer relationship with whatever deity (or higher figure, or what-have-you) said person has professed to follow. It is further insulting to name such a group after a person (as in ES’s naming of those people he believes to be lax in their religious activities as “polycarps”).
Oh, please. You want to see a gangbang? Go read FreakFreely’s meltdown. If you think this is a gangbang, I wonder what lily-white field you’ve been living in where butterflies frolic with children, there’s fresh fruit all year round, and nobody’s allergic to pollen.
And what’s so bad about being a dumb fat twat?
Some of my best friends . . .
Sorry, couldn’t get the sentence out. And you really should watch how you insult people.
I’m not Fenris, and I don’t play him on “Whose Line is it, Anyway?”, but I’m going to take a big ol’ leap of faityh here and say he’s not interested.
I don’t think it’s the questioning per se, but the lack of background information, the way in which said “questioning” is presented, and the apparent total lack of respect for another poster (Polycarp) who had done nothing to Eternal Student to deserve such an (albeit pathetic and wrong) response.
Thanks, we try:)
[Upon Preview]
You’re doing an excellent job so far. You and Eternal Sophomore should get together some time to trade notes.