In other words, placing a poster’s most recent offering within the conceptual framework of the entirety of their posting to date. Which is an essentially contextual process. So, context = bad.
Here, you’re explicitly claiming that your argument as phrased in the OP can be bolstered by viewing it in context. So, context = good.
So, essentially, you’re talking out both sides of your mouth, taking both sides of a position within the same post. Yup, you’re a [del]liar[/del] salesman.
So you DO admit to calling me a moron after claiming you didn’t. Then, you did it again!
That’s quite some pretzel logic you just posted there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow, you really are stupid.
I never said “I didn’t call you a moron”. I said:
Uh, no…
Let me try spelling this out for you one more time.
You said your reply was about the person who said “your a moron”, as that’s what “so says” means when following a quote.
I didn’t say “your a moron”
Ergo, your post wasn’t about me.
If you said you were talking about the person who said “moron”, that would be a different story, as I am that person. And you prove my case with every post.
Still not sure what a search engine had to do with anything though. (And as I can use them, it can be further argued that I’m still not the person you’re talking about, but I don’t want to confuse you with that track.)
No, you didn’t say anything about spending any time on me (or even anything about time at all)–you said you’d refuse my money if I offered it.
Let’s look again:
The OP could’ve played this into a “stupid customer stories” thread, probably, with members who’ve worked in sales telling horror stories and such, but as soon as he expressed outrage at being mocked, all he did was ensure that he would continue to be mocked.
Oh, I missed the edit window but I wanted to add:
Deciding for someone that they won’t buy is generally a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You may want to watch “Pretty Woman”.
I did say that it was a fun pit thread. 
Split hairs much? Your obviously not smart enough to split atoms.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Grammatical error notwithstanding, that doesn’t even make sense. Splitting atoms is considerably more challenging than splitting hairs.
I sure hope you’re a good salesman because physics and science, your bag they are not.
I’m sorry. Was I talking to you?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes.
We must have different browsers then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or a different understanding of what it means to post commentary in public. If you want a private conversation, take it elsewhere. Otherwise, anything any of us post on an open thread is effectively addressed to anyone who can read and respond to it.
What a maroon!
|ETA Maroon, you may want to consider what it means to post to a PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD. Your idiocy is, by default, addressed to all of us.
MORON.
Wow you sound real angry.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Um…
I’m sorry you don’t know what quotation marks mean?
Seriously, I’m really not sure what you’re looking for here.
You remind me of an angry monkey. You just keep jumping around, hollering, and making no sense.
LOL yes, I am the angry one.
Yes, what a fun thread!
Very happy rh returned to the thread. It was getting cold.
I just have one question for rh, have you learned anything from this exercise?
I really hope, for the sake of anyone forced to deal with him in the future, the answer is “how to use quotation marks & what they mean”–but, somehow, I doubt it.
That is CLASSIC stuff! How did I miss that one?
I like that part where he tells IT that they have 12 hours to fix the problem (apparently they read the Dope too), and then he’s going to tell … the customers! Because they’re certainly going to enjoy being involved in company infighting over an expired password.