Selling crack on a street corner doesn’t count Willie Loman.
I’ve figured out what the OP sells…
SHOVELS.
Dude, stop digging.
(Stops by to sit on Russian Heel’s fancy sofa and eat popcorn)
ETA: (Reads D_odds’ comment and coughs up popcorn)
Actually Kellyanne, it was more like “Was that a threat? We need to talk to a mod about this!”
You don’t have any microwaves in your display booth do you? They spy on you.
You mean like this asshole?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I always like looking at other things on cites like that. I enjoyed this one:
Real Talk – Should Guys Be Afraid To Send Their Girlfriends To Soul Cycle?
(apparently an indoor cycling class where the instructors are just looking to get laid - and maybe the women who are working out are too!
No, I mean the ones you were referring to.
But it’s nice that you finally found a quasi-relevant citation 3 years after you made your idiotic post–and over 12 hours after you already replied to that comment & the conversation moved way past it.
It’d seem to be OP’s favorite website–they also cited it in their Lena Dunham thread.
Your just butt-hurt because you shot your big mouth off about my previous OP and I found a video that completely supports my point.
Its hardly “quasi-relevant”. It show,s as you said I said, a snowplow driver deliberately plowing in a driveway.
I dont know how old the video is but its was trending on Twitter this morning so I didn’t for out of my way to find it not that it matters.
You and Mr Mean Mustard seem to have this hangup with how fast someone relies to their post. Again please show me where it says I must reply within 12 hours.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No it doesn’t.
Of course, you’ve shown an inability to remember what your point actually is, so I suppose we could let that go.
Yes, that’s what makes it quasi-relevant.
To be completely relevant, it’d need to be the actual driveway that you were talking about.
“Single snowplow driver is an asshole” =/= “My snowplow driver is an asshole”
Nobody doubted that some plow drivers do that on purpose–in fact, IIRC, your thread had several responses that acknowledged they do. The issue is that you insisted it was happening to you, while simultaneously ignoring the actual physics of how plows work (hint: most don’t “dump” snow anywhere; in fact, the ones you were explicitly referring to don’t dump snow like you insisted).
But, again, you’ve shown that you’re a bit slow on the uptake.
I didn’t say a single thing about how long it takes to reply to a post.
Your problem here is that you did reply to the post.
Then the conversation moved on.
Then you came back 12 hours later with a cite and an “in your face” type response–which makes you look a bit pathetic.
If you can’t see the difference between “not responding in 12 hours” and “responding in a matter of minutes only to bring the conversation back to that topic 12 hours later with a post that you insist makes your point (not to mention that it doesn’t), thus painting a picture of someone dwelling on an insignificant detail”, then, well… Like I said, slow on the uptake.
ENGLISH, iMOTHERFUCKER. DO YOU SPEAK IT!?
Well that explains where RH got the idea for a vinyl sofa in his booth.
ahem
Your =/= You’re.
I had to get that off my chest.
jftr, Debillw3, the OP is a guy; you can refer to him as “he.”
So noted.
Are we sure? Maybe she wears a lot of Siradekian shoes.
What “sense” do you need? He hates his job and blows off his hate by whipping out his iPhone to vent at us. Probably from a barstool, most of the time.
Your caps lock key is stuck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So 12 hours is the official limitation on bringing up new information that wasn’t available before?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes?