Aren’t they holding him down prior to the arrival of some as yet unseen chap with a big axe and a hood?
You all need to put away your religious dabblings because I have found Deeper than Spiritual which is by far the finest wall art I have ever seen. And this charming piece “features two original leaves from the fall of 2005”.
Right clicking on any image on the site will assure you that this superior artist knows her Berne Convention rights, in case you were getting any ideas.
[QUOTE=Tapioca Dextrin]
Aren’t they holding him down prior to the arrival of some as yet unseen chap with a big axe and a hood?
[/QUOTE]
One can but dream.
Meanwhile, back in the same pretty little village we have Jesus on the cross, with a giant sideways disembodied head dangling over Him - a post-Salome John the Baptist, I’m thinking, based on the previous painting and ryobserver’s analysis.
Also, I perceive that Jesus is bleeding suspiciously from the crotch, besmirching (or blessing) the placid waters. Or is that John’s blood, touching the Messiah suggestively on His winkie?
Now I’m thinking that these two paintings actually make a pair - a before and after, with a lot of sexual tension going on, all stuck in the mud at the seafront in Sussex.
[QUOTE=Tengu]
Oh, man, I misread that as ‘Jesus the bugger’ and clicked expecting something a lot more interesting than that…
[/QUOTE]
I got your “Jesus the Bugger” right here. As proof, it comes from a place called “the gayest place on Earth.”
[QUOTE=jjimm]
In
In laying down the gauntlet, I challenge you to find worse than Incarnation. (Warning: has a man’s winkie in it, so though it’s art, it may be NSFW if you’re John Ashcroft.)
Strangely, the winkie seems to be emanating some sort of floating tendrils, which are raining down a golden shower on the Christ-figure’s head. He appears to be scooping it up in a cup, or perhaps playing the tambourine. Or is the youth being born? If so, why is the birth fire flowing up his knob?
[/QUOTE]
Speaking of winkies, the loincloth wearing guy appears to have a substatial “interest” in floating barenaked winkie guy. I’m seeing homoerotic porn masquerading as religious art here, people.
On preview, no it could not be any more gay! :o :eek: 
[QUOTE=Tuckerfan]
I got your “Jesus the Bugger” right here.
[/QUOTE]
From out of the shadows, Ninja Jesus claims another victim.
"*Nails?! * You like to nail things up, do you? Well let’s see how well you can hammer in those nails after I reach into your torso and tear out your heart!"
Warning: The sight of nails makes Ninja Jesus crazy.
[QUOTE=jjimm]
I choked on my wine. That’s fucking brilliant. I am seriously considering buying it.
[/QUOTE]
Does WriterChick know what evil you’re considering allowing to enter your house? :eek:
For my nomination, this bit of political art comes to mind.
[QUOTE=SmartAleq]
Speaking of winkies, the loincloth wearing guy appears to have a substatial “interest” in floating barenaked winkie guy. I’m seeing homoerotic porn masquerading as religious art here, people.
On preview, no it could not be any more gay! :o :eek:
[/QUOTE]
Not only that, but take a look at the photo of Durand here and tell me that all those blonde wispy JCs aren’t self-portraits of him when he was younger (and wishful enhancement to picture how he wishes he looked).
[QUOTE=Quiddity Glomfuster]
Not only that, but take a look at the photo of Durand here and tell me that all those blonde wispy JCs aren’t self-portraits of him when he was younger (and wishful enhancement to picture how he wishes he looked).
[/QUOTE]
For some reason, I’m not seeing any photo.
It’s the best pinata ever!
[QUOTE=capybara]
I submit an historical example, by the artist I loathe most of all, William Holman Hunt, the Hireling Shepherd
Everything he does makes me shudder. I want to just slap him and Ford Maddox Brown around a bit.
[/QUOTE]
Is he really reaching around the woman to get to the sheep?
[QUOTE=Jahdra]
This sculpture is just wrong, on so many levels. May not be SFW. Or anyone, really. Link. Scroll all the way down for the full effect.
[/QUOTE]
Boy nothing gets me hotter than a good fairy with a bare boob, and a beer gut.
Maybe not really art, but I had to share the top one on that page (“Life of Jesus- Christian Catholic 3D Collectors’ Plate”).
Unfortunately, I keep on seeing it as a clock. (Still only ten past ten?) 
his is Durand guy is a gold mine of bad.
This lovely offering. The face of the guy on the right makes it.
This one may or may not be safe for workNaked kid with a creepy evil face sits on a (possibly mystic) sheep. What can you possibly say about it?
[QUOTE=Lord Il Palazzo]
Durand guy
[/QUOTE]
What IS up with this guy?! He may not have the single worst piece of art on the internet, but as a collection he can’t be beat. Why all the strangely religiosexual themes? I want to know, dammit! It’s like Boris Vellejo on a bad cocktail of communion wafers, Viagra, and acid.
Why hasn’t anyone yet posted those scary freaky big-eyed paintings?
[QUOTE=Lord Il Palazzo]
<snip>This one may or may not be safe for workNaked kid with a creepy evil face sits on a (possibly mystic) sheep. What can you possibly say about it?
[/QUOTE]
In Didling, Sussex, no less. :eek: Durand likes painting winkies. I don’t think we need to look a lot further than that.
I would like to nominate Trisha Romance. She’s Canada’s answer to Thomas Kinkade, and she’s dead serious - you can’t go into an art shop in Canada without seeing her stuff everywhere. Glurge on canvas, man.
[QUOTE=featherlou]
I would like to nominate Trisha Romance.
[/QUOTE]
The eternal question: Her paintings are crap but she’s hot.
Y’know, I blew this once before and I don’t intend to do it again. I can put up with crappy paintings for an evening.
[QUOTE=featherlou]
I would like to nominate Trisha Romance.
[/QUOTE]
They look like sappy greeting cards, but they don’t make you question her sanity like Durand’s art.
She should do a nude self portrait series.
[QUOTE=Waverly]
They look like sappy greeting cards, but they don’t make you question her sanity like Durand’s art.<snip>
[/QUOTE]
Well, it might if I bought one, but I get your point.