As you’ve probably heard by now, the dollar hit an all-time low against the Euro, aided and abetted by the government’s redefinition of what a strong currency means. We all thought that to describe a currency as “strong” meant that it holds its own against other currencies. But apparently we were wrong. A strong currency, so they say, means that it’s “difficult to counterfeit”. Umm, yeah. That really helps my stepdaughter as she heads for the UK next Saturday. I suppose they’ll soon decide that a strong currency means that the paper note has at least a certain minimum amount of shearing strength–i.e. difficult to tear.
Actually, if you’re interested, there was already a GD thread on this precise subject a little while ago. There was broad agreement in the thread that the dollar had to come down (and has to come down some more), but disagreement whether Sec’y Snow’s comments risk accelerating the decline too quickly. All rather civilized, actually. Or you can be an idiot like rjung and just rant against Bush without a scintilla of knowledge about currencies.
Sorry you’re stepdaughter will have a more expensive trip as a result, though. Having done Europe on a strong dollar and on a weaker dollar, I can certainly agree that for tourism purposes (or moving there purposes, or whatever her trip is about), it’s more fun with a strong buck!