Flash: Lohan Not as Cute as Monroe (NSFW)

What’s wrong with little nipples? She’s aging fast, but I’d hit that. Oh yes, yes I would.

Much nicer than bolt ons. Visible curves and flesh. The freckles make her skin photograph much older than she is-or the living’s caught up to her.
But God’s cock, who did her make up to make her look like Shelley Winters?

It wasn’t the freckles, it was the bags…(and not those bags - which for her age do seem a little too "I’ve spent too much time without a bra - I’m a D cup, and mine didn’t droop that much until after I finished breastfeeding my daughter - at 34).

Rode hard and put away wet.

And Zebra, when a phrase like “Maxim… could have taken way, way better pictures” gets used, that’s about as bad as it gets.

She has a redhead’s coloring, she should have kept the red hair.

Other than that, no complaints!

(No, she’s not Marilyn Monroe. Chocolate chip cookies are not tiramisu. Chocolate chip cookies are good.)

Eh, I wouldn’t kick her out of bed for eating crackers, but, nah, nothing special.

Never mind eating crackers. The question is whether you’d kick her out of bed for being crackers.

How can somebody as young as her fail the pencil test?

Have you ever seen a paparazzi photo of her where she is actually wearing a bra?

For the last two years or so I’ve wondered just exactly is going on with her looking like a 40 year old woman. There is seriously no way I’d ever guess her to be anything less than 35 in almost every picture I’ve seen of her since she’s hit about 20.

Girl needs to slow down and start taking care of herself.

Hmm, I may be wrong but I always thought the pencil test was just to let you know if your boobs were big enough to need a bra or not. Pencil falls = you can get away with going without. Pencil stays = You have big tatas and you should put those in a bra.

I think the blonde washes her out and makes her look older than she is. She’s absolutely adorable as a redhead.

Also, I don’t think her boobs look bad at all.

a woman,

A.

What Montgomery0 said above. There’s a deadness in Lohan’s face. When Monroe smiled, the world was hers.

Other than the pill popping, Monroe lived clean. She jogged, did weights, didn’t smoke and wasn’t a boozer. She was carrying a few extra pounds on her circa Some Like It Hot, but two years later she trimmed down and looked radiant at 36 in her last, unfinished picture, Something’s Got to Give.

I’ll give you that (the wig ain’t flattering either), but she’s still got a face and (naked) body that could stop traffic in both directions. Sour grapes is one thing, but to call those breasts anything other than the shining beacons of joy that they are is simply disingenuous.

(In all seriousness, I can appreciate that you legitimately think there are faults in them. I don’t.)

Actually, for a girl who does enough cocaine, that’s pretty much a technicality at most.

Yeah, I’m going with the concensus. She was lovely as a voluptuous redhead, but as a coked-out bleach-blond, she just seems so ordinary.

Spectacular knockers, though.

I think Can means but, but “Cans” (plural) means boobs. Or maybe it can mean both if plural. Like 'she’s got huge cans" and “Our hockey team kicked the other team’s cans.”…

I can’t believe i just spent the last minute thinking about ways to say cans.

Um…after looking at the pics…(couldn’t in my above post, because I was at work and there was nudity warning. Luckily I live five minutes away from work) I have to say…she ain’t that hot. I mean I wouldn’t kick Lohan off of a mattress but I’ve seen prettier girls…hell, at work.

Monroe always looked radiant - even in those weird photos where she is obviously overtired and stoned, she still has something. She had too much drama in her life, some of it self created.

I’m trying to decide whose publicist would think that a photo shoot where your client can only fail to live up to Marilyn is a good idea. Obviously, Lohan’s. But really, there are a few Hollywood Legends you are not going to live up to and don’t want to invite comparisons to. Marilyn Monroe is at the top of that list.

(Audrey Hepburn would be the other ‘bad idea to mimic’ choice that springs to mind. No one can pull of Audrey and not look like a pale imitation.)

Slide 7 is a decent picture - there’s a hint of playfulness there, and the lighting is flattering. The black and white/heavily desaturated shots just make her skin look… mottled.

Slide 9 just plain baffles me. I cannot wrap my mind around whatever it is I’m looking at. Is she wearing something? Holding it in front of her? Both? Confusion. And from mid-torso down, she just looks oddly deformed (because of the way the fabric/pattern covers her).

Well, then that explains the “Orange is the new tan” thing she was so fond of at one point - and actually, I think there are some pics of her taken recently where she is back to that lovely fake-n-bake rust-colored hue. Enough of the fake spray tan can cover many flaws, including freckles. Use too much of, it, and well…Cheeto’s Orange, anyone?

Not that the color shots were all that flattering, but - EW! Those black & white shots are TERRIBLE. The Priscilla Presley Wedding makeup complete with white-looking frosty lipstick is a nice touch. Blech.

She’s a hard looking 25 (or however old she is now). I have 10 years on her, and I look how she should look NOW.

…if I do say so myself. :stuck_out_tongue: