If only she were 25. She’s 21.
Flash: Lohan not as cute as the checkout girl at the supermarket, the little one who doesn’t smile often but has really great eyes.
I thought the photos were pretty. She’s a pretty girl, although no Marilyn. Who is, you know? Marilyn was Marilyn.
The bleached blonde hair wasn’t flattering – that’s a damned hard color to pull off. And I didn’t care for the makeup, either. All in all, I’d say it’s too bad they felt they needed to go the faux-Marilyn route. Similar photos with Lohan’s own hair and more flattering makeup would have been better.
Still, pretty photos of a very pretty girl. And it’s nice to see natural breasts on a starlet, isn’t it?
Wow. I can’t believe a thread concerning Lindsay Lohan’s first offical naked pictures is so… academic.
Have the years of paparazzi-ing really jaded you all?
Here is Marilyn’s Playboy centerfold photo. Aren’t those boobs prettier than Lohan’s?
I have nothing against large boobs. I’ve seen some very nice ones. Lohan’s look like udders in those photos.
I think some of us are surprised that after all the fuss about her and her exploits well… she’s really not all that looks wise. Other than her having large eyes and being somewhat buxom (and dressing provocatively) she’s not really all that pretty in the classical “Hollywood star” sense of the word. There are lots of women you see everyday just as, if not more, attractive than she is.
She and Jessica Simpson both seem to be carried along largely on on the strength of having large natural breasts and large, expressive eyes, and a predilection for showing their cleavage off at every opportunity, and not terribly much more other than a touch of box of rocks dumb (Simpson) and substance abuse crazy (Lohan) (not that there’s anything wrong with that).
BTW what was the big deal about how great the famous photographer was on that scenario? The posing was awful. Any second rate men’s magazine could have done a better job.
Had they recreated the Marilyn shoot (same poses) with Lohan as a redhead, it probably would been better all around. Lohan would have stood on her own as a rather striking woman (and she is, in my opinion, striking, even if she looks older than she is and is rather freckled) and yet played homage.
Not too familiar with Jessica, but Ms. Lohan’s success started when she was rather young, non-buxom, non-cleavage-baring, and presumably non-substance abusing-- she’s been acting since she was 10, and made a decent splash at the ripe old age of 11 in the remake of The Parent Trap. So, she had something else propelling her along before her life turned into a trainwreck-- perhaps her large eyes. Maybe it’s trashiness and breasts now, but it’s not what got her career rolling, at least.
Anyway… the pictures aren’t bad. The makeup is meh (horrible for black and white), and she’d look so much better with her natural hair color. She looks better a little zaftig than skinny… looks like she’s finally leaving her waif look behind. And I’m happy to see freckles, much better than the spray-on orange “tan” she usually sports.
I think its far more interesting that 96 posts worth of “I’d hit that.” Frankly, I’m pretty convinced that there are people who’d do Ed the Talking Horse if he was properly posed in bra and panties.
The problem with her “natural” hair color is that she hasn’t been seen with it in a while now. She’s either bleaching it blonde or going darker.
I’m THRILLED she’s left the Keira Knightley look behind her (at least for now). All women look better when they have SOME body fat.
And I liked the pre-crazy Lindsay Lohan - I always thought she had some talent and charisma in addition to being attractive. The remake of The Parent Trap is one of my kid’s favorite movies - and one I don’t mind watching either. I hope she pulls it out.
Half the female population uses red hair dye, and Lohan becomes a lousy blonde. Life really isn’t fair, is it?
The way those collar bones stick out she still looks waify to me.
Cocaine and cigarettes will really age the skin.
Very nice udders if you ask me. Sure we’ve all seen better in real life or in pictures, but those are still good looking.
I agree with everyone about the way she has aged. I also think that she looks better when she has curves. She looked really nice in Mean Girls and if she could have kept that healthy and sexy look.
So true. And unfortunately, there was something like a three-year period where it was a miracle to see a photo of Lohan in which she didn’t have a cigarette in her mouth.
According to IMDB, Lohan is now 21. Look at how much older (and rougher) she looks now than she did in Mean Girls. That movie came out four years ago, and Lohan looks about ten years older than she did in it.
I’m 24, and Lohan looks considerably older than all of the girls my age I hang out with. Sad, really. She has reportedly been trying to quit smoking, though. I can’t imagine the havoc that all of that smoking and being constantly dehydrated from all the drinking and drugs wrecked on her body, to say nothing of being in the sun all the time. Eek.
I’d do her. Nice tits, blond isn’t really that great a color on her though. At least she’d be fun to party with before and/or after. A little crazy is okay with me, but Brittney is too far gone.
She’s got no shape - no waist, no ass, and the boobs hang down with no side curve. There’s one photo where she’s holding up a transparent piece of fabric and I couldn’t tell if she was facing forward or backward.
And to think less than two weeks ago, when I posted a link to a clip from a G-rated movie in which Julie Andrews “stripped” down to a corset, that was declared “not safe for work” and the URL was disabled… 