For all of you woodpecker hating motherfuckers.

Or woodpecker fucking haters, whatever.

This is really just here to avoid hijacking This thread more than it has been already. My take is that Ogre is being a bit of a tool. No doubt some of you will think that I am.

My general comment, weather or not you agree with what I said in that thread, is that there is a pretty big fucking difference between having an opinion that someone disagrees with and expressing that opinion in a sarcastic way and “putting words” in that poster’s mouth. There is also a huge difference between that and “junior modding”. YMMV, naturally.

Huh. Pitted, but mildly. This is a first.

You attributed something to me that I never said. You specifically snarked that “it is an indictment on Walloon’s character that he did not know about this bird until now.”

This is not what I said. I do, however, think that it’s an indictment of his character that he does not care. Additionally, he returned to the thread to dismiss my explantation of why it was an important discovery. He was being a dick.

Of course, now we’ll have an avalanche of Dopers posting just to say “Well, I don’t care either.”

In that case, yes, you’re dicks too.

Ogre,, would you have felt better if I had said “it seems to me , based on my interpretation of your reaction to Walloon’s post, that you are acting as if it is an indictment on Walloon’s character that he did not know about this bird until now.”? Do you need that much disclaimer? Was what I was saying in that thread that unclear?

Yes. I snarked. Forgive me father, for I have been sarcastic. Og help me, I will probably be sarcastic in the future. My issue is that there is a huge glaring fucking difference between, as you seem to be claiming, my misunderstanding what you are getting at and my “putting words in your mouth” or attributing things to you that you did not say.

I would have felt better if you had said, “Yes, it’s an indictment of Walloon’s character that he doesn’t seem to care as much about the rediscovery of the bird as much as the rest of you do.”

That way, you’d have responded rather precisely to my point, rather than missing it completely.

But you did. I don’t think any less of Walloon because he didn’t know about the bird.

I hate that fuggin guy. “Ha ha ha HA ha, ha ha ha HA ha!” Yeah, “ha” this you lameass bottomfeeding loser. You were just filler between the good cartoons. Andy Panda sucked, too.

Look, when you are stating things like

And

It is not a stretch that I would see this as some sort of incitement by you of his character (both of which came before his “eh” post, BTW).

Now, if you want to tell me that this is wrong I have no problem with that. The issue that I have is that you are accusing me of Junior Modding and putting words in your mouth. That is different. I don’t know how to better make this clear to you.

OK. It’s wrong. Walloon said:

Ignorance is the lack of knowledge about something. It’s not “ignorance.” It’s ignorance. I did a little snarkery of my own by capitalizing it. I did so because he came back to the thread and polluted it again with his “who cares?” attitude. The accusation of ignorance was not an indictment of his character. It was simply a fact. He was ignorant about the issue, not “ignorant.” This board is a place where I come to learn all sorts of interesting new things…and some I find not so interesting. I doubt you’ll ever see me popping into a Buffy thread and pissing on the thread with a “who really cares?” Why is it more acceptable in the ivory-bill thread?

In your second example, you nailed it. By that point, even before his “eh” post, he had come into the thread twice to crap on it, and the entire ivory-bill issue. Therefore, yes, my second response is an indictment of his character. The issue of endangered species and extinction is one that, IMNSHO, everyone should care about. If you don’t, there’s something wrong.

Simple. You attributed something to me that I did not say. I did not say that I thought less of Walloon because he did not know about the ivory-bill before now. I did say that I thought less of him because he does not care.

Two completely different statements with two completely different meanings. See? Snark, sure. But snark accurately.

I don’t know, I am pretty sure that I am just not getting through to you. My guess is that you have pretty much made up your mind, and that is going to be the end of it. It may be that we are operating on different definitions here.

If you say that I am inaccurate in my take that you were bitching him out because of his ignorance, fine. I will take you at your word and move on. I have been wrong about things in the past and will be wrong about things in the future.

Where I have issue is that me misinterpreting what you mean is a far cry from misattributing things to you, putting words in your mouth and playing junior mod (which is what you are accusing me of). Specifically, those things are at very least terrible bad faith posting and at worst violations of the board rules.

What is weird to me is that you seem to be making no distinction at all between these two things that are night and day to me.

Having said all of that, I will note (for what it’s worth) that I don’t think that your warning in that thread was justified. While I think that it is clear that I think that you are being a bit of a tool, I really did not see any direct personal insults coming from you.

Hmm. You may be right. I haven’t specifically addressed the Junior Mod remark.

OK. If, in fact, this was a case of misinterpretation, rather than misattribution, I apologize. It seemed to me that the difference between “ignorance of the issue” and “not caring about the issue,” in terms of that thread, was, as you say “night and day.” I frankly thought that you did it on purpose, because I couldn’t see how you would misinterpret what I was saying that badly. If I was unclear in my statements, I once again apologize.

The Junior Mod accusation sprang from this:

Now, I may have been guilty of misinterpreting, but I took this as a rather condescending Junior-Moddish “suggestion.” In other words, I’ve been around quite a while myself. I know when behavior absolutely crosses the “Report This Post” line, so I’ll thank you to stick to the topic at hand and not drag board moderation into it, making it a bigger tempest-in-a-teapot than it already is.

Even if you had misinterpreted him the first time, he pretty quickly reiterated what he said in words of one syllable, whereat you persisted in mischaracterizing his arguments.

Knowing how volatile the whole “Junior Mod” issue is here, however, I do unreservedly withdraw that accusation. I overstated my case.

In essence, I think that we are in accord. I was reading you as taking the poster in question to task over his ignorance. I think that I just could not imagine (until later posts, and even then I can’t quite wrap my head around it) someone being blasé about the discovery of a species previously thought to be extinct. To me, that would rank right up there with “they discovered a cure for Cancer? Ho, hum.”

This is not to say that I was not being condescending! I do that from time to time, but in this case my sense was that I was being accused of breaking board rules, when I was sure that I was not.

In any event, I hope we don’t have to hug or some shit.

OK. We’re clear. Thanks.

And let’s not hug. You might cop a feel.

If you want to get into the whole exhibit A, exibit B aspect of this we can. In essence this post:

was made proior to me reading this post:

I did not preview before posting. My fucking bad. And you know what else, even as I am composing this very post I already know that I am not going to priview it! It is possible that it will be slighlty out of sequence as well! It may even have typos or messed up tags! Anarchy!

Now, if that one post counts as me “persisting” in anything (you will note that my posts after that were all dealing with what I thought was a set of acusations that I did not deserve) to you I really don’t know what to tell you except that perhaps you have a rather bizarre outlook on life and are rather quick to assume the worst in people

But Wally Walrus rocked.

(My kids go to school with one of Lantz’s grandkids. They say he’s a tool. Maybe he posts here as Walloon or Binarydrone.)

Well aren’t you nice?

You know, I really don’t give a shit about the ivory-billed woodpecker, either. That’s no excuse for me to come in and piss all over everyone else’s fun. So what if it’s not a big deal to me? It’s a big deal to a lot of other people, and they probably don’t particularly care if I feel “underwhelmed” about it. There’s a word for people who do things like that, and it starts with “T.”

And it ends with “otal asshole.”

I think **Walloon ** is a total dick. And I don’t often call people that. Why the fuck were you even in there if you don’t care? Now the thread is closed or in the Pit or whatever. Good job.

Why the flaming FUCK do people feel like it’s perfectly OK to go around crapping all over everyone’s threads? I don’t care that you haven’t gotten laid since 1979 and then it was a goat you felched, or whatever the reason is for your crappy-ass mood. It’s so rude.

Amen to that!