For All Those Who Do Not Believe In GOD?

Lucky and Major Quimby:

I don’t think Ken Gentry’s conclusions about the identity of the person the author of Revelations was referring to are necessarily wrong or crazy. (Is there some handy latin phrase for “assuming that everything a person says is wrong just because he’s nuts about some things”?) I just thought it was interesting that these frothing-at-the-mouth types can come off as being the Voices of Reason and Sanity in this particular debate…as long as you don’t dig too deep beneath the surface, anyway.

Polycarp:

Nehemiah Scudder isn’t a bad analogy. I also think Rousas Rushdoony bears a noticeable resemblance to the late Ayatollah Khomeini…in more ways than one.

There are places where the Reconstructionists are even more explicit than in those links you cite. (I have to say, they’re pretty honest about their views…or at any rate, they aren’t very good at being deceptive about them.) There is this interview with Reconstructionist minister Andrew Sandlin, in which he opines that “under the Old Testament law the public worship of a false god is forbidden. In a biblical society, cults, or people who do not hold to a bare minimum orthodoxy, can hold their faith. They can teach their children their faith. But as far as public worship, the Bible does seem to forbid public worship that is contrary to Christian worship.” (His references to not wanting an “Ayatollah fundamentalist regime” are amazingly ironic.) There’s also this essay, in which another Reconstructionist pastor, Brian Schwertley, calls for the death penalty for “the open practice of idolatry”. Reconstructionist books–they tend towards real tomes–also frequently really lay it on the line. Gary North (whom even the other Reconstructionists fondly call “Scary Gary”) has helpfully made a number of them available at his Institute for Christian Economics website (which seems to be down at the moment, or I’d post some more explicit links). If you care to dig around in there, you can find explicit calls for the death penalty for everything from adultery and sodomy to witchcraft and blasphemy.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think these people are going to Take Over, or at least I see no evidence of it at the present time. Their views are (I very much hope) way out of line with the views of the great majority of Americans. But they’re definitely a scary bunch, no doubt about it.

No, no. I told you – it’s an implied social contact.

Oops, wrong thread…

**PolyCarp wrote:

From what little I know of modern Heathenism, they do not want to be equated with Neopaganism – they’re two very disparate pre-Christian traditions brought down to the present. Almost no Heathens remain in Germany or most of Scandinavia, although there are a few in scattered spots.
A small percentage (1-2%) of Icelanders are Heathen, and there are small groups of them scattered through North America, with a concentration in Missouri. Their doctrine focuses in Tiw (AKA Tyr) – the original supreme god of the Norse, though by the time of the recorded myths he had been reduced to a wargod under Odin, god of wisdom and judgment. They accept and honor the other Aesir and Vanir as a sort of supporting cast to Tyr, and their morality, which is quite
conservative and patriarchal (women are definitely second-class in their system), is based on a warrior ethic and achieving “worthiness” through study of wisdom and physical ordeals. Probably the closest modern parallel would be the Japanese Bushido ethic.

Freyr, from your name choice you clearly know more than you have posted so far. I’ve gotten all this second- and thirdhand from a Heathen friend where we used to live, so it may have some errors of fact or emphasis. Can you add or correct anything?**

YIPES I’ve been found out! :slight_smile: Guilty as charged. My degree is in anthropology with a minor in comparative religion. I’ve done some research into modern paganism and its history. What you’ve said about modern heathenism or the continuation of Antique pagan practices into modern times is pretty much right on.

There are some small groups of Antique heathen practices scattered throughout the US, tho mainly east of the Mississippi.

Interestingly enough, once the USSR fell, many records opened up about what soviet anthropologists have found. It seems that even into the 20th century, continuation of Antique pagan practices have been found. It appears that modern Xian priests/ministers put on robes fashioned in an Antique pagan style and went out to bless the fields, etc.

I got this info from a friend at the last gathering of my Coven I went to. I’ll try to track him down and get some citations.

I haven’t read the last page of this thread so if I overstate something…
As to what phil said, you won’t be able to grow your own food or forage, as the government will own all land; you’d need the mark to have the land to plant on.

Also, its not the mark that is wrong, you can’t just take the mark and go straight to hell.
You must also worship the image of the antichrist
(probably some holographic image).

Every day I tell myself, don’t give up on Jesus, you can’t give up on Jesus. But reading threads like this makes me want to throw in the towel and go Deist. I’ve spent the last couple weeks reading http://www.deist.com/ and the writings of Paine, Jefferson, and Franklin and have come to the conclusion that these were very smart, rational fellows who make an awful lot of sense.

Do you currently worship God and/or Jesus but have a problem buying everything the Bible says? Does too much of it fly in the face of science? Does too much seem illogical? Do you feel your faith can’t stretch that far? Have you ever uttered the phrase, “I don’t mind God, it’s his followers I can’t stand”? The gon Deist! Believe in and worship God without having to swallow all the gobble-dee-gook. Deists believe that the Bible, which portrays God as wrathful, jealous, and murderous, does more to slander Him than honor him and have chucked it in favor of a belief that is simple and pure:

God created the universe. Explore it, study it, and enjoy it. What could be easier??

I’ve composed a letter to the editor of the local paper in response to an editorial they ran yesterday about prayer in school. Below is the long version, before I pared it down to fit the 500-word-or-fewer requirement. It probably does portray me as a Deist, even though I’m not sure I’m ready to commit (I’m pretty flighty). At this point, I prefer to be thought of as a Deist-sympathizer.

"There is a very good reason why teacher-led prayer is not permitted in public schools: the public pays teachers to educate, not preach or pray. The only morals they are required to enforce are those mandated by the school and the law: don’t steal, don’t hurt each other, respect each other’s person and property, etc. Anything more than that is the responsibility of the families.

"Of course students can pray all they want on their own. At least when I was in school, we had 4 minutes between classes, plus 8-minute morning and afternoon breaks, and about 45 minutes for lunch. Plenty of time for the students that are so inclined to pray to their contentment. Anyone who challenges that is obstructing their rights protected by the First Amendment.

"So what did the Founding Fathers intend with the First Amendment? What were they thinking? We’ll never be able to ask them, but we can develop an educated opinion by reading their essays and correspondence. Would the FF be opposed to prayer in school? We must examine their writings to draw a conclusion. However, in my opinion, it doesn’t look good for the prayer crowd.

"Many were avowed Deists, meaning they believed in the Creator, but that His word is found in nature and science, not in the Bible. Many denied the divinity of Christ, even his existence, and considered the Bible to be a collection of superstitions and fables. Thomas Jefferson “cut and pasted” the New Testament to create his own work, “The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth,” also called “The Jefferson Bible.” Gone were the miracles and supernatural, left only was the story of a wise philosopher and teacher. In January 1802, Jefferson wrote in a letter to the Danbury Baptists, “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislative should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.” Does he sound like someone who would approve of tax-paid teachers leading students in prayer?

"Jefferson was not alone. Thomas Paine, author of “Common Sense,” also authored, “Age of Reason,” a Deist text railing against the Bible and revealed religions like Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. Benjamin Franklin, Ethan Allen, and George Washington were also prominent Deists. Franklin wrote in his autobiography, “Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle’s Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.” They believed in Providence, but believed that God could not be “dictated” to and that one should only offer prayers of thanksgiving. Again, do they sound like they would appreciate school officials praying for blessings before a football game? Or that they would approve of a Jewish text which includes commandments on how to worship God being displayed in the classroom?

"BUT Deists demand tolerance for the beliefs of others. For example, many of the FF were against Catholicism, but George Washington forbade his men from observing “Pope’s Day,” a day celebrated by burning the Pope in effigy, because it was disrespectful. As the World Union of Deists says, “Hate the superstition, not the superstitious.”

"Finally, before I’m rode out of town on a rail for supporting the views of heretics and heathens, please allow me to quote Jesus Himself in Matthew 6:5-6, “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.” Does it sound like Jesus wants to see teachers standing there for all to see leading children in prayer? Doesn’t it sound like He would rather it be done at home, in private, just between the individual and God? Just some food for thought.

“In conclusion, the First Amendment guarantees that all people have a right to worship or not worship the Creator however they see fit, and the government, no matter how subtly, has no place in that worship. Our schools’, government’s, and parents’ time and energy would be better spent educating students about the history of this country and lives of its founders than quibbling over whether or not schools should be used as places of worship.”

Oh, and to be a little more on topic, Revelation is the ravings of a madman. From what I heard on A&E’s “Mysteries of the Bible,” when the Church first compiled the Bible, they were very torn on the issue of whether to include Revelation. When Martin Luther tossed out the books known commonly as the Apacropha, he and his followers were also torn as to whether or not to leave Revelation in. Go ahead, take their doubts as a sign that Satan was trying to tempt them into throwing out the word of God. I’d rather take it as a sign that Satan succeeded in tempting them to leave in ramblings of a lunatic.

If someone claiming to be the Antichrist told me I needed a mark, tattoo, etc., to procure food, I would say, “You’re mad!”

And to everyone who is absolutely, positively 100% certain we’re living in the endtimes, let me just say that you are not the first. See also A Brief History of the Apacolypse.

Good link for racin’ fans, Gr8Kat. Here’s one that actually talks about deism.

Thanks, Xeno :o

:rolleyes:

Nuff said.

Just as a casual observation, has anybody here taken into consideration the idea that the book was written in figurative language, for the very good reason that spelling out the idea that Nero was gonna lose in the long run to the forces of Christ would mean the author’s head? I am prepared to grant the theory that the author confused the idea of the Second Coming with the less-in-the-future end of persecutions. But, as a bottom line, whether or not you agree with anything he says, the man in Rome with the most authority is of Polish descent and claims to represent the Christ who is alleged to have inspired the book in question. Just consider that a public comment by one of his subordinates inspired a rather fiery thread in this very forum within the last few days. On the other hand, none of Nero’s descendents, collateral or otherwise, seems to have made the news in the last 1500 years.

Gr8Kat,

I cannot let your post pass without offering you assurance that even as you are tempted to “give up on Jesus,” He will not give up on you. But I would never encourage you to follow Christians. Christians are just men. They have no greater wisdom than any other type of fool. They might aspire to live lives given to the glory of God, but the simple facts of life are that Christians have every single failing to which the Earth is heir. Following Christians is a pointless exercise in self-delusion, and vanity.

Instead look into your own heart, and make it into a place of love, and compassion for every soul that lives on this Earth. That ought to keep you busy for a while. But the task is the goal, and the place you prepare in your heart will be the place where you find the Lord. For pretty much the same reason, you won’t be able to show Him to anyone else. Look not for the living, among the dead. Revelations is a book. The book is not the Word, the Lord is the Word. Theology is the study of God. Faith is traveling to Him.

I choose faith, and to you I can only recommend the same, with love, and what fellowship you desire.

Tris