For David B, the good Doctor and others who are knowledgable about Creation debate

RTFirefly wrote:

I’ve also seen it as a “Jesus” fish eating a Darwin fish. The caption, ironically, read “Survival of the Fittest”.

Damn.

I tried.

I really did.

But Poly’s (?) Tolerance thread sent me back.

Stan A’s “sweet-talk[ing] and smooth[ing] over the road to hell,” says Lauralee.
There’s some kinda poetic justice there.

(Aw, shit, Satan–tell me she’s not related to Heatherlee?)

And she comments, “Something tells me the evil one is attacking [Pariah] now more than we know.”

Heh heh. Someone told her your other name, Stan?

Fortunately, Frostie is “not evil, just misguided.”

As I said, they’re cultists and obsessives, and I thank Allah, Kdapt, and Ganesha that I don’t have to live with 'em.

Love, luck and lollipops, all.

-a-

::sigh:: It’s bad enough that I couldn’t get on the Most Hated Poster thread…but NOW, I can’t even make the Fundies hate me…

Must be losin’ my touch!

-David

BUMP

(Hey, if they can do it Over There…)


>< DARWIN >
__L___L

Well, I screamed and I ranted and I raved…made me feel a little better, but it didn’t do a bit of good otherwise. Think I scared Lauralee a little, but that really wasn’t my intention.

I believe the show’s over for me. I won’t say that I’m NOT going back–we’ve all seen how low the recovery rate is–but I doubt that I’ll be posting anything important.

If I see ya there, I’ll give ya a root beer &nbsp &nbsp :wink:

-David

Where did you scream and rant and rave? (Which thread?) I popped in for a couple seconds yesterday and may or may not do so today. Weekends just haven’t been very good for me in terms of hitting the web.

The worst of it came out here:
I Cor16:22…

I think I’ll just hang around the popcorn stand–for awhile, anyway…

-David
Please work, Mr. HTML

Oh, that’s nothing! Jeez, I thought it was something serious. :slight_smile:

I like the bit about getting mad at the people who call “Stan” “Satan.” I liked even better the part telling them to get on their knees 'cus if you were God…

Thomas just doesn’t get it…

Oh, I forgot to mention…

If I were God, everyone would also receive daily manna in the form of Starbuck’s Java Chip icecream… Damn, that stuff’s good!

No, Thomas doesn’t get it. And I tire of blowing a fuse everytime he says something moronic. The boy needs help…

-David

I’ve been busy:
www.leftbehind.com/cgi-bbs/Forum8/HTML/001319-3.html

and
www.leftbehind.com/cgi-bbs/Forum8/HTML/001433.html

I’ll be back tomorrow.


>< DARWIN >
__L___L

And their best reply to you?

-David
now I have a headache

ummm, guys, i am just curious as to how this “debate” has continued for so long:
are there any creationists even speaking???
it seems like everyone is just re-affirming each other’s anti-creationist views here. so, where exactly is the “debate”???
if there is no real conflict going on, then is this topic really worthy of 10 frigging pages on the “Great Debates” message board???
just curious, and i might be mistaken…


“I play the fool, Pyotr Alexandrovitch, to make myself agreeable.”
–Fyodor Pavlovitch, Brothers Karamazov

Gunes, we’re having a discussion about a debate. If you’re not interested, don’t read it. Nobody is making you read 10 pages of stuff.

Soulfrost said:

Bleagh. I’m glad you’re not God!

David:

Why are y’all doing this, please?


“It is lucky for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler

Because there are powerful forces, working overtly and covertly, seeking to throw science out of the classroom and replace it with “creation science”. They have intimidated congressmen, put people on school boards(without letting the people know what their true agenda is), and have presented to the public the false dichotomy of presenting equally valid methods of science.
The Institute of Creation Research makes all members sign a document stating that the members must pre-suppose the truth of Creationism and the falsehood of evolution, which is not science in any way, shape, or form.
If there is actual evidence of Creationism, it must be brought foward. If there isn’t any evidence, the people that propose Creationism must admit that there isn’t any, or be exposed for the frauds they are.
Nothing less, in my eyes, is silent agreement with their statement.

Lib: In part because some of the folks there will never go looking for information on their own. There are some who admit they only read pro-creationism sources, for example. They promote liars (like Kent Hovind) without knowing all the facts about him and what he says. They buy the nonsense without ever looking at the sense. So some of us decided to spend a little time trying to bring rationality to their lives.

slythe:

As one who has pointed out to Phil many times the dangers of majoritarianism, I can sympathize. It ought not to be that those with the most political clout trump the desire of parents to have their children schooled in evolutionary science.

And maybe that was the original intention when y’all first went over there, but now people appear to be doing exactly what is expressly prohibited by their policy, namely, posting for the purpose of harrassing and badgering. Arguing the evolution position is one thing, but two of the links above lead to discussions on the God and the rock paradox and the Shroud of Turin.

No offense, but I mean, look at yourselves.

You go over there like undercover Navy SEALS, create as much disturbance as you can, and then rally back here to divide your spoils and congratulate each other. That is just plain weird.

By the way, I might start a thread here on the God and the rock paradox because I believe there is a simple resolution of it.


“It is lucky for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler

David:

Okay. Maybe I’m just overreacting.


“It is lucky for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler

Hey, jab1, you might not wanna “tip your hand” so much on the Left Behind message board with that Darwin-fish logo. :slight_smile:

You’re probably right. On the other hand, I’m using identical UserNames. If they can’t figure it out from that, well…

Someone Over There is rather upset that I’m using the Darwin Amphibian. (See “C vs E, A Matter of Faith.”) But couldn’t a “Jesus Fish” be considered a graven image?

Frankly, my only real concern is that the Darwin Amphibian may be copyrighted. I may be able to find out in Skeptical Inquirer.


>< DARWIN >
__L___L