This is too long to adopt as a sig, isn’t it?
Too bad - it’s brilliant stuff. And I think I recognize some of my posts in there somewhere.
Oh sure, now you tell me.
Regards,
Shodan
(Emphasis added.)
You know, if you really wanted to piss him off, don’t call him a “good Tom” - call him a “good Hottentot”. That really gets some panties in a wad.
Regards,
Shodan
Yeah, I’m not reading this whole thing.
I do find it interesting that someone compared Der Trihs to the recently departed VCO3. I think that’s spot on.
Of course, as his viewpoints are supported by some folks, in particular his anti-war/anti-american/anti-Bush stances, I don’t expect him to get banned for his trolling anytime soon.
Because that’s exactly what it is, trolling.
Also, those asking him to come here and speak up? Don’t bother. He is too much of a coward to appear in these pit threads.
His detractors here are too chicken-shit to debate him in GD more like.
Actually, no they don’t belong to the side they think they’re on, because this is the really real world and not subjective universe fantasyland. Shit doesn’t change just because you think it should on Planet Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy. But like I said, he’s fucking nuts and you’re his pal, so it shouldn’t surprise me that the complete subjectivity is the gist of your entire argument. The real world exists and in it, you’re wrong. And pussy post-dissection is the last refuge of the losing argument.
“Kicks the crap out of people”? Not on any debate that I’ve ever seen.
I think that Little Plastic Ninja’s summar of his debating style is spot on. It’s only “kicking the crap out of people” if we consider belligerence to be a sign of intellectual victory.
Oooh, ya got me…not. Learn a new racial slur on these boards last year, did we? Keen to try it out in a way that won’t get your ass banned, I see. Have fun with that, I don’t care.
I’ll just let the idiocy speak for itself.
No, it’s because his detractors know that any debate that involves DT will inevitably degenerate into unsubstantiated, unnuanced assertions on his part. In other words, it’s a huge waste of time.
Right, the last time I tried to bring the facts that my brother had observed while in Iraq into the debate, he called my brother a liar and a killer. Indeed, he said that he had been brainwashed by the military to lie about anything and everything.
When I tried to point out the good things that relgious organizations had done, he said they are just PR, trying to trick me into liking them.
I don’t debate him in GD because there’s no fucking point. In GD he is a troll, period.
So, if one searched GD to see if people had, in fact, debated DT, he wouldn’t find any instances of that. Is that right?
You may want to try it and then recalibrate you reality meter.
Heh. I say the same damned thing on the first page of every pitting of DT, and yet on the 5th or 6th page of the damned thread, I’m still there flailing away. It’s a compulsion. You know you should ignore the fucking I’m-too-psycho-to-even-be-a-troll hosebeast, but you just can’t let it alone. I bet this is why the WBC is still around too after all these years.
Ewww, no thanks. There’s no skin off my nose either, and I don’t want there to be. Ask your wife, or does she charge you extra for that?
Last time I gainsaid him in a GD abortion thread, he vanished like a snowball in a blast furnace, so you better not be counting me among the ranks of the chicken-shit.
I think Shodan’s point was that for all your harping on the thin-skinnedness of those who are just afraid of the intellectual rigour of Der’s arguments, you have been known to get a barrowload of sand in your vagina when it was your own ox being gored. (Too damn many metaphors in that sentence. Shame, they’re staying now.)
Of course, the author of the “racial slur” was someone at least as black as you, and 'prox ten times classier on her posting history since. 
But you were doing such a great job of it. Dang, you were just about to show me that the objective universe doesn’t matter and that reality is nothing compared to what we prefer to believe to be true! Der Trihs doesn’t give support and aid to American forces because he says he doesn’t, and that’s all the MrDibble universe needs! It was brilliant. Say it a few more times just so I can savor it.
Ahh come on, don’t run away, I was just havin’ fun. Hey, you’re really smart, I mean that. Like really. Really really.
Well, a little review of this pitting (or many others) might suggest that your opinion isn’t grounded much in reality, now wouldn’t it?
Have you not read this thread, or one of the many others. People object to his positions AND his childish method of “debate”. Fuck man, even most people who agree with his positions think he is a pure shithead. They’d rather have him making points for the other side. Oh, he dosen’t curse… let’s give him gold star! :rolleyes:
What the hell are you talking about—people DO attempt to debate him in GD. Some have numerous times and simply given up. Why? Because they were “losing”? No, because he can’t debate. He is unable to present or see any nuance. He cannot give an inch when he clearly should and it would HELP his larger point. People on his own side have pointed this out to him ad nauseum.
Actually, no, she doesn’t charge extra for that.
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
I’d be interested in hearing you explain how your position is “slightly more nuanced” than DT’s.
I’m with you. I’ve tried to debate him. Then I gave up - you can’t debate a fanatic, even if he is right, but most particularly when he’s wrong.
And on the rare occasion when he’s on my side (about religion, but without the black-and-white idiocy) I always die a little inside.
She doesn’t cha–
:mad: :mad:
Goddamnit, Dibble, tell her I want my money back!!
You know what hurts? She told me she was giving me a serviceman’s discount!
And now I see that you already have, so never mind.
Has he every admitted to making a mistake in GD? We have a few posters like that, who stake out a position, then either twist the facts to support that position, or ignore the facts altogether while refusing to give up that position. Or, saying something like: I don’t have a cite, but I’m 100% certain I read this 25 years ago in a magazine. :rolleyes: You can’t debate a person like that, but I do think there is value in correcting the ignorance he spreads-- there are lots of lurkers who may not be familiar with his stubborn refusal to deal with facts rather than simply spouting some unsupported opinion.
Yes, quite a few of us atheists/agnostics are none too happy to see him chime in on our side of a debate.