Fuck yeah
Hell, I hug my *SO * in non-filthy ways. Or are you seriously telling me that every time you hug your partner it leads to hot dirty sex?
I already have. Where’s my money?
To quote the movie Diggstown:
“Then what would you need the [ten million dollars] for?”
No. No, I’m not.
It’s just that if you’re going to keep your end of the bargain, then it’s important to make sure that no sexual gratification can occur; not that it necessarily would.
Perhaps hugs would be allowed as long as both the hugger and huggie are wearing long, heavy winter coats.
Yes; I think that would be acceptable. (Ten-million $$$ is way more worthwhile than even the best sex!)
Forget it. Now you’re not just saying sex, but you’ve changed it to affection, too. I’m not giving up affection, *that * is more important than sex or money to me.
Absolutely. I’m asexual anyway, and money is nice.
don’t even have to think about it.
no way.
I think that a better question is could I have gone without sex at 24, not would. In any case, the answer would have been no.
No, although I’m not a sex fiend, by any stretch of the imagination.
But I wouldn’t give up coffee for ten million, mostly because if someone were to make such a grandiose, ridiculous, pointless offer, my instinctive reaction would be to slap their stupid face.
If it’s a one time deal, as in, today or never, then no. I can manage OK without that much money. I’ll be financially stable someday, and that’ll be enough to content me.
The problems that abstinence would wreak upon my marriage would, however, be monumental. And I really, really, want to have a child the “old fashioned” way, providing that my husband and I are both able. (If not, we’d be adopting anyway, none of this artificial non-sexual conception stuff.)
So…I get the $10 million and I do what I do with the money, say I turn it into $20 million.
Hell freezes over and I get lucky.
Do I only have to give back the original $10 and keep what it earned for me?
To answer the OP, whether or not I’d accept really depends on the day. Today I’d want to see the cash.
Absolutely. Sure, sex is great and all, but it’s ten million damn dollars! I’m sure that with that kind of money I could find a drug that would simulate orgasm without involving touch (and that would be allowed under the parameter of the OP). I’d miss being in a relationship, but I could hire some kind of platonic life partner and it would be almost as good.
Ten million!
Lemme put it this way. All my getting rich fantasies involve all the creative ways I could court beautiful women and all the crazy debauched parties I’d throw. Methinks this would be self-defeating.
No, no, and no.
Money is nice. Sex is better.
:dubious:
If you’ve really had both… and you’re willing to give up the latter for a measly ten mil…
Well, there must be some really amazing thing you can do with money that I’m completely unaware of.
Hell no, not even worth a second thought.
Bingo! I just think I’d have to be some kind of total loser to value money more than I value sex. (This obviously doesn’t apply to the asexual–it only applies to myself personally). Hell, there’s very few pleasures I’d give up for any amount of money. That’s just not how my head works.
Daniel
What’s the point of owning $10 millions if you can’t use them to get laid???
Nope, I don’t sign up. I’m not sure what I could do with $ 10 millions, anyway, but certainly nothing that would be worth giving up sex.
Barring a situation where I’m starving/ homeless, I can’t see what I could buy which would be more valuable than having a sex life. A castle? A painting? A yacht? Definitely not.
I mean if I was just giving up sex with other people I’d probably be fine. Lets be honest here, I haven’t had it yet, how could I possibly miss it.
But no touching? You’ve got to be out of your mind.