(Warning – long post ahead)
Zulu –
I don’t mean to belittle your experience as an adopted child, but the very circumstances of your birth and subsequent adoption take you out of this discussion, as far as personal experience is concerned. Your bio-mom was 19 years old, as you say – this means she was not a minor, and the decision was hers to make. She made what appears to have been the best choice for you and for her.
When dealing with minors, there are a lot of different issues. First, there’s a strong likelihood that a minor mother will not have very well-developed decision-making powers (i.e. she went and got her dumb jailbait ass knocked up, to put it bluntly) and may have a lot of illusions about bearing and raising children that simply aren’t true. This will probably leave a lot of emotional scars on ther mother, the child, and everybody nearby.
Second, there’s the health of both parties. The younger you are, the more likely you are to suffer death or permanent harm while trying to carry a child to term. the risks are just as bad for the baby, in terms of birth defects and survival rate.
Third, a minor is going to have a lot more obstacles to raising that child than will a young (but major) woman. Your mom probably finished high school, Zulu, and once upon a time a HS education was all you needed to get by. Can we say the same of a 14-year-old in today’s world?
Somebody else on this board has tried to turn the argument around by substituting blindness for pregnancy. Is it just me, or does this make no sense? The kid could either have sight restored or die. Either way (forgive my bluntness here) the problem is solved, and it only involves one life. Furthermore, blindness is probably easier to cope with in this case – you’ll have already been accustomed to caring for a sight-impaired person, and might be able to fix it. With pregnancy, you’re dealing with the baby’s life if not aborted, the mother’s life which will almost certainly be wrecked if she has the kid, the family which will have to take care of them both for years and years, and let’s not forget the father and his family – they will probably be responsible for child support payments for the next 18 years.
I am aware that some people have been able to make the teen pregnancy thing work out in the end. Those cases are exceptions. The typical 15 or 16 year old girl is going to wreak havoc in her little part of the world by having that baby, and we’ll all suffer for it.
The solution is not to put more children up for adoption – despite what you may hear, there are plenty of kids on the market. Most adopting parents are looking for healthy white infants. If you’re a minority, or you have a physical/emotional/developmental problem, or you’re older than age 3, there’s very little hope of you ever being adopted. Sad but true.
All that having been said, would I make my (non-existant) daughter have an abortion in this case? It all depends on her age, her health, her maturity level, the family’s finances, and so much more. I hope that I’d have raised her to see that abortion was an alternative that might be best here, so no force would be involved.
–Da Cap’n