Is the quadruply erroneous three-word sentence really “no longer remembered”?
In the alternative, can anyone offer an example of a three-word sentence with four grammatical errors? (Errors in spelling or usage don’t count, only grammatical errors.)
Maybe if someone accidentally typed “see Spot run.”, when what they had intended to type was “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”.
Neither the site I first looked at nor Wikipedia on English grammar considers punctuation to be part of grammar.
Ok, I think I’ve gotten there in English with Ditransitive verbs, which are verbs that take two objects.
The sentence “Them puts myself” has two incorrect pronouns, verb disagreement between the object and verb, and “put” is a verb that requires two objects “He put it there”.
I don’t think the “gooder” sentence qualifies, since “gooder” isn’t a word, so you can’t really reason about what grammatical rules might apply. If that one qualifies, then so does that sentence with any non-word string of characters as the last word.
“Put” doesn’t require two objects and doesn’t have two in your sentence. “There” is an adverb in your sentence. “Gave” is a ditransitive verb as in “I gave Jim the book.” “Book” is the direct object and Jim is the indirect object.
So it does. I think it still works for the OP, though. “Put” requires an object and a locative adverb, and there isn’t one?
I tried to make a broken sentence using the ditransitive verbs listed, but they all seem to work with an implied object. “I gave the book” seems like it works in context.
Now I challenge anyone to get eight errors in a three-word sentence! (Not necessarily saying it can’t be done, especially if you fiddle around with how word order errors are counted so that you could get more than one…)
#1 in your last example is wrong, as an starts with a vowel. Perhaps use the fact that there is no subject to the sentence.
Plus there’s the problem that all of your statements could arguably be argued not to be sentences. I’d personally grant the first one, but not the rest.
That’s circular reasoning: the reason they’re not sentences is because they’re ungrammatical. Of course, the more errors they contain, the less they “seem” like sentences.
This is fun and all, but the sentence Miss Gould found was in the manuscript of a story for The New Yorker – and was, in fact, printed in the magazine without correction – so it’s unlikely to have sounded like something a Horta would burn into a rock.
One thing that I noticed while I was thinking of sentences is that grammatical errors can’t always be confined to or determined by a single sentence.
If person A is talking with person B about gifts A and C had given to D: “We gave him a book and ten million dollars.”, then person C says “I gave the book”, that would be a perfectly grammatical sentence. The verb “gave” requires a second object, but the object is implied by the previous sentence, so the sentence that doesn’t explicitly mention it isn’t ungrammatical in context.
The thing I like about “put” is that I can’t think of a context in which the locative adverb could be implied. Although, now that I’ve said that, I fully expect someone to come up with one.