Four women defend their former lover

From the Lord It’s Bullshit satire newswire

“I think I did something for the worst possible reason — just because I could,” a contrite former President William Jefferson Clinton tells 60 Minutes as his soon-to-be best selling autobiography My Life hit the shelves. The “something” he references is an ambiguously quantified collection of affairs and trists spanning an amazing political career, from his first term as Governor of Arkansas, where he risked his political reputation to champion an unpopular motor vehicle tax, to his second term as President of the United States, where he risked his political reputation to hold a federal court in contempt.

Four of the women he encountered along the way share their retrospective musings with reporters.

“I was really upset when I first heard it,” Monica Lewinsky tells Britain’s ITV, referencing the president’s just-because-I-could defense. “It has been so difficult because of so many of the lies that he has told.” When asked whether she believed he had taken advantage of her, she expresses the anguished contradictions of her emotions, “It’s hard to not think that when you hear someone say [mocking tone] ‘because I could’.”

But is Ms. Lewinsky bitter? No, and in fact, she expresses her admiration for her former boss’s success as a family man and father. “He has a daughter that is only six years younger than me. She is now the age that I was when this investigation started.” Reflecting fondly on her memories, she hopes that he can experience their love again vicariously through his daughter, “How would he feel if this happened to her?”

Jennifer Flowers had announced during the presidential primaries that she and Mr. Clinton had had a twelve-year affair. Then candidate Clinton denied the affair with his wife by his side on a nationally televised interview. But in his new book, he admits that there was “an incident”, denying only that it lasted for twelve years. And in fairness, it may in fact have lasted only eleven years, ten months, and twenty-four days.

Ms. Flowers has responded by issuing a statement of reconciliation, recognizing the former president as a figure of national importance. “I am sickened by his continued disregard for the truth,” she writes. “He is a national disgrace.”

In his book, for which he received an advance of $10 million dollars, President Clinton says that Paula Corbin Jones was interested only in money. The woman who sued him for sexual harrassment holds no grudges, and in fact speaks cheerfully of his success. “Oh, it’s funny. You can laugh about it. You know, I didn’t hardly get any money out of that, and he’s the one that’s gotten all the money. He’s the one who’s profiting off of all of this at the moment, and he’s continuing to do so.”

Ms. Jones says that she looks forward to seeing the former president again some day. “Oh, I would like to debate that man. And I would love to look him in the eye and say, ‘Can you honestly tell me that you never remember meeting me, and never remember doing what you did to me’?”

What Kathleen Willey remembers most fondly is Mr. Clinton’s tenacity, and his never-give-up courage and determination. “What a shame for what he put this country through because he couldn’t control himself. Because he was always out there looking for the next one.”

Perhaps Ms. Willey’s only regret is that she did not cash in on her affair. “I said no to Bill Clinton, and I said no to money. I haven’t made one dime off of this story, and it’s been hard. And I’m proud that I didn’t do that.”

Pride goeth before a fall, they say. Supporters point out that it is remarkable how President Clinton endured what these women put him through with their promiscuity and their reckless disregard for protocol and decorum. Others say that the former president might share a portion of the blame since, after all, he did allow himself to be overpowered by their advances. No one really knows what history will say, but now that Mr. Clinton has confessed all, perhaps history will be kind, and record that in the end he said, “I cannot tell a lie. I did pop those cherries.”

I’m getting this printed on a T-shirt!

Is any more evidence needed that Clinton’s affairs were none of our goddamn business?

Liberaltarian, either you’re cherrypicking topics from salacious reviews, or you’re no better informed than everyone else who has *not * read the book (fair disclosure: the abridged audio version for me). Clinton drew a strong parallel to his having the affair “because I could” with Gingrich’s informing him that the Republicans were going to find a way to impeach him “because they could”. Yes, Clinton presents that as a direct quote. Isn’t in any review I know of, or commented upon by anyone as ignorant about it as yourself, though.

I’m also getting a “Because I Could” T-Shirt. :slight_smile:

Actually, I was cherrypicking from salacious interviews with Clinton and his bitches.

Why the fuck does anyone still care what Clinton did or didn’t do four, eight, 16 or 20 years ago? You right wingers need to get over your obsessions with this guy. I’m beginning to suspect a little “man-love” at this point.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Why the fuck does anyone still care what Clinton did or didn’t do four, eight, 16 or 20 years ago?

If he really did rape that girl (whose name is escaping me), it should never be forgotten.

That’s why men get away with rape. “Get over it, honey, it was 10 years ago.” With an attitude like that no wonder most rape victims don’t even bother pressing charges.

I don’t know about classic liberals, but I thought libertarians were for the right to keep one’s private live private. Was this one of the reasons for the name change, so you could continually bring up The Adventures Of Clinton’s Penis for years and years without feeling quite so hypocritical?

:::yawn:::
So what?

Juanita Broaddrick was the rape victim. Regarding “the right to keep one’s private live private”, libertarians generally embrace the concept of mutual consent and of holding to contractual commitments, like the commitment to forsake all others.

I get where you’re coming from Abbie but isn’t that sort of a hypothetical ‘never forget’?

If there were overwhelming evidence, or a conviction sure. But the fact that the guy screws around really isn’t something to drag up every twenty minutes for the rest of our lives. He’s probably still screwing around. It’s up to him to do anyway, and if that’s how he wants to live his life, so be it.

Is there an irony here anyone else sees?

Wow … way to repect women there.

Misogyny in the defense of meanspirited sarcasm is no vice, eh?

Daniel

I have concluded that the reason pubbies are so obsessed with judging and condemning Clinton based on his sex life and his sex life alone is because they don’t have sex lives. I mean, really. Would YOU be able to look at the twitchy face of our current president and say “oh, baby, yeah, I want you BAD!” And can you imagine Laura ever needing knee pads? I think not. I can barely consider the possibility without recoilling. Newt Gingrich? Ew. The “Voice of Conservatism,” Rush Limbaugh? I’d rather spend a couple hours in a dental chair, thank you.
William Jefferson Clinton is an attractive, charismatic man. He had sex. Lots of it apparently. SO. FUCKING. WHAT??? He did do other things when he was in office. When he left, we had good will from the community of nations. Now squandered. When he left, we had a solid economy. Poof. When he left, he handed over a country with a record low unemployment rate. Really. When you look at all these things, is it THAT important he got a blowjob at the office? And, should it concern anyone except his wife?

Ok, just to take mild issue here, she’s at best an alleged rape victim. It’s been my understanding that her entire rape victim status is based on third party heresay, and that she herself denies it. I had thought that it was based on a couple of people who she allegedly told she was raped, even though whether or not she was friends with those people couldn’t be ascertained.

I’m not saying she wasn’t raped, but I think at least she should say so first, and then maybe some evidence could be presented to support that. Once again, I’m not a Clinton expert, so I may be mistaken.

In addition, it’s their marriage, to honor or dishonor as they please. How you uphold a contract is up to you, at the peril of the consequences that are laid out for failing to uphold it. Those consequences and how they’re handed out are up to Bill and Hillary to work out.

Clinton’s commitment to his wife to forsake all others, and/or failure to do so, is your business exactly how?

Are you saying a good libertarian is one who delves into their neighbors’ and leaders’ private sex lives to verify they are not violating their marriage commitments? That that is more important to a libertarian than the neighbor or leader’s right to privacy?

Love ya, Lib:slight_smile:

No. Are you saying that Florence Henderson is from the planet Marvax?

Skillfully done! :smiley:

No? Then I’ll ask again: How is Clinton’s commitment to his wife to forsake all others, and/or failure to do so, any of your business?