Lots of things are different.
First off, how many people heard of anyone besides Jones and Lewinski when it came to the original incident? They were the big ones. I honestly didn’t even know this Broadchurch or Willey existed back then. Sure, we knew of some “other accusations,” but these were the ones considered most important. We all just assumed they were of the same veracity as the others.
Then there’s Broadchurch’s own denial. If anyone did know anything about her, it was that there was this one woman who signed an affidavit saying that nothing untoward actually happened. That’s just more reason to fit the concept that this was all a partisan attack.
And that’s an issue, too. The partisan attack. It’s not as if Republicans were upset about rape or anything. That shows by their priorities. They hired someone to dig up dirt on Bill Clinton. And they didn’t get him on rape or anything, but on his denial that he had an affair. The whole thing seemed like partisanship, so a lot of us didn’t research the details.
Also, how would we research the details? Sure, the Internet existed, but it wasn’t what it is today. You couldn’t go pull up Broadchurch’s statements. What we had was what the media told us, and what we were told was, again, about Lewinski and Jones. And Kenneth Star and Janet Reno. We didn’t have the info.
Since then, Broadchurch has recanted her denial. But she was also no longer in the news. The first time I heard about her was in the Clinton/Trump election, and it was, once again, partisanship. There was no way that Trump was against this sort of thing. He specifically brought it out because of the accusations against him. And Broadchurch herself came off as sympathetic towards Trump and his ideas, which made it seem like she was just doing it to hurt the Clintons.
But now we’re in the middle of a different, non-politically motivated anti-rape war. And the information that we didn’t have before is easily available. We know more about how people deny assault but later come back out with it, not because they are lying. We are in the middle of trying to push a great purge.
So we’ve turned back to look. And what we see shows that our reasoning was based more on all those other factors we mentioned than actually evaluating her story. We see that she’s not really that different from other stories we accept.
And, yes, I’ll admit it. We see this sort of thing being dismissed on the Republican side, and we find that disgusting. And we see a situation where, despite the above making it understandable, we seem to be fighting someone and not believing a rape accusation. We are ignoring how many were made. We see that there are skeletons in our closet we need to clean up.
We can’t really be the party that doesn’t accept rape and sexual assault if one of our more prominent people has issues on this subject. It’s a political liability. So we are less likely to give Clinton the benefit of the doubt.