Not really, given that Rastafari and its legend of ancient Jewish heritage long pre-dates the social phenomenon of “cultural appropriation” debates. Jewish imagery and identification is now part of a decades-long tradition of Rastafarianism.
Jewish kids wearing dreadlocks, OTOH, is not a decades-long tradition in Judaism. Just because your hair (like many other non-Jewish and non-black people’s hair) would “naturally” form dreadlocks if you didn’t groom it differently doesn’t make dreadlocks traditional in Jewish culture.
Mind you, as I said before, I personally don’t have any problem at all with white kids wearing dreadlocks or Chinese dresses or saris. And I hope eventually in a more highly evolved world there would be lots more multidirectional sharing of cultural heritage in all sorts of ways.
But that doesn’t mean that the two particular examples of sharing of cultural heritage that you identified are actually as analogous as you think they are. Afro-Jamaicans in the mid-20th century adopting some Judaic history and imagery (largely via their experience of Christian religious practice and Christian study of the Bible, by the way), as part of their socioreligious movement, is not a “perfect counterpoint” to American Jewish youths in the 2010s wearing dreadlocks as a fashion statement largely influenced by black hairstyles.
For what it’s worth, I am not at all offended that the Pope wears a kippa.
With Jews for Jesus, I don’t think the outrage is so much over “some goy is wearing a kippa” as “missionaries are dressing up as Jews in order to convert us”. Because that’s basically what JfJ is- Christians painting a Jewish veneer on Christianity in order to trick Jews into thinking that they’re still practicing a form of Judaism.
So, when Matthew is making that argument, he’s one of the Four Evangelists, but come forward 2,000 years and it’s putting a Jewish veneer on Christianity to trick Jews.
It just popped into my head as a response, as Matthew seems to be the writer most interested in explaining how Jesus fits into Judaism. I don’t think I’m very serious about it.
Yes, well, the Jews that read Matthew and think “hey, this is great, think I’ll join this club” are called “Christians”.
It’s not that I have a problem with who the Jews for Jesus crowd are worshiping, the problem I have is that they’re claiming their religion is Jewish and it’s NOT - it’s Christian. It’s false pretenses.
I agree that usually, Jewish outrage over so-called Messianic Judaism is primarily about the evangelizing aspect. But the cite I linked to in the post where I brought it up was specifically and explicitly criticizing Messianic Judaism as a form of “cultural appropriation” of Judaism.
I live in the Bay Area. You people in SoCal wearing Levis are stealing our culture.
Not to mention the 99% of people I saw in Hong Kong in western clothes.
Hell, they even stole our malls. :eek:
When I lived in the Congo the Congolese considered American blacks as Europeans. The act of asking that question is either stupid or racist (or both) since it implies that all people of a color are the same, no matter how long ago their cultures diverged.
My wife told me today that she thinks the actual reason the guy was mad about the dress was because of its sexy cut; that despite his protestations of defending the freedom of women, he actually dislikes it because he wants to control women, and frowns on such a sexy qipao.
I… uh, I am not sure I buy into this, but it was a take on it that I hadn’t seen yet. My wife’s understandably more sensitive about the issue of sexism in Chinese culture.
I was really confused about where this “sexy cut” thing came up, since the dress looked pretty modest to me, but then I looked at the pics from Twitter and realized there’s a pretty high slit. Are they usually like that? (This is not in any way to suggest that there’s anything wrong with that).
Nah, that would definitely be a deliberately ‘sexy’ qipao. For a formal one, I linked earlier to pictures of how Peng Liyuan often dresses. Tiny little hint of a slit near the ankle, very modest.