Expect to see a lot more of this sort of criminal idiocy. I have heard horror stories about incidents like a grad student returning to school in the US from India being summarily jailed and deported because he protested when US Customs wanted to confiscate his laptop for inspection.
I am sympathetic to responsible officials sincerely trying to be vigilant and fair in anti-terrorism measures, but incidents like this suggest that INS/Customs ranks also include a number of ignorant assholes who would rather ship an innocent person halfway around the world than admit they could be wrong about something.
wolfman: An Indian, with a hispanic name, and a Canadian passport is unusual and suspicious […]
Not to anyone with half a clue about India and Indian immigrants in North America. Canada has tons of people of Indian descent, and India has tons of people with Portuguese ancestry and Portuguese surnames. I don’t mind if the average US citizen isn’t aware of this, but it makes me rather nervous if the freaking **officers of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, who are supposed to have some professional knowledge concerning typical immigration patterns in North America, don’t have a clue about it.
(“Cruz says an officer also asked her why her surname was not ‘Singh’ and commented that it was clever of her to use a Spanish name.”
:rolleyes: So, this taxpayer-supported US government official who is supposed to be somewhat knowledgeable about foreign immigrants thinks
that just because she’s Indian, her surname should be “Singh”. Swell.)
“Suspicious”? Like a terrorist coming in from India, whose passport says they were born in India, would be likely to think that using a Hispanic-sounding name would make them less noticeable than using an Indian-sounding name? In what kind of comic-book spy-thriller universe does that sound plausible?
SmackFu: She didn’t have to travel through the U.S., did she?
Oh yeah, now that’s the kind of message our country, not to mention our tourism industry, is hoping to send to the rest of the world, not to mention our own citizens who travel abroad. “Listen up! If you happen to look in any way ‘suspicious’ to any ill-informed agent when you’re going through customs, you better believe that we’ll throw you in jail and ship you off to a distant country without any namby-pamby pretense of listening to what you have to say for yourself! And if you don’t like that, well then, you don’t have to travel through here, do you?”
That’s what they call a “very long-term anti-terrorism strategy”: i.e., annihilate our economy and alienate the rest of the world to such an extent that eventually we no longer have anything worth blowing up, at which point the terrorists will lose interest. :rolleyes: