Fuck you for trying to equate me with the alt-right, and to imply that I am not in fact myself a liberal. Which I most assuredly am.
Furthermore, you still don’t really understand virtue signaling, although you’re getting closer. Someone who virtue signals need not be lazy, or even using “empty words”. They need only be peacocking about how exceptionally generous/kind/“woke” they are, and contrasting themselves with their ordinary and less virtuous counterparts. It’s basically a kind of bragging without explicitly doing so, and the braggadocio need not be false or even insincere.
The point is, as we’ve been saying over and over, to prevent it from being done to more infants and young children who cannot meaningfully consent. Your post also illustrates why it is important not to delink MGM and FGM, as everything you said could be applied to women/girls, even those who are victims of the most severe cutting. Was that your intent?
The hypocrisy here is that you are the one who never posts anything of substance. Just these short, uncapitalized ad hominem attacks. I mean, it’s a big board and I read very little of it, so I guess it’s possible you contribute something substantive elsewhere. But I haven’t seen it, so I have my doubts.
This is really something, if you unpack it. Wow. :eek:
First of all, you and others have apparently misunderstood my “jackhammer” reference, par for the course ITT. I was referring to hand jobs, not to intercourse. I get the job done just fine in the latter area, though—and before you snark that my partners have probably just been faking it, I really don’t think my ex-girlfriend was such a Method actor as to pretend to momentarily lose control of her body (from the cowgirl position) such as to smack her head against mine and give us both nasty goose-eggs.
But what really blows my mind is that you seem to be shrugging that sure, maybe uncut guys (who are, let’s remember, in their naturally evolved state) get more pleasure, but this leads them to be too self-absorbed in bed, leading to less satisfaction for their partner. Well, gee: I had a girlfriend who was kind of obsessed with fingering her clit during intercourse (doggy style or cowgirl), and I did sometimes have fleeting thoughts that it led her to be off in her own world and not paying enough attention to me. I guess I should have wished for her to have a clitorectomy to selfishly increase my own satisfaction in sex! And I mean, aren’t those infibulations supposed to make it tighter and more pleasurable for the guy as well? I mean, Jesus fucking Christ, think about what you are saying!
I have another idea: how about everyone keeps all their erogenous tissue, and tries to seek out maximum mutual pleasure from there? A radical concept, I know! :smack:
Someone else who misunderstood what I meant. But this “more functional” thing is really rich. You are on a board that prizes science and logic. What sense does it make to argue that evolution got the penis wrong, and people with knives a few thousand years ago figured out how to improve on it? :dubious: