Genre Fiction Mafia

Sillier things have happened than forgetting what your alignment is.

Likelihood of a third faction? I don’t know. It’s a small enough game that I could believe no third faction. After 8 Day/Night cycles, assuming one lynch per Day and one NK per night, we’d be at 5 players, which is pretty much end game and fits the generally accepted rule that a game should last no more than 2 months. I think your best bet for determining the probability of a third party is to look at previous games designed by Red and see how they balance. Me, I’m just going to hang tight and enjoy the ride. I rarely worry about things like setup this early. There’s practically an infinite number of ways to balance the game and the only real piece of information that I have right now is my alignment and role and I can’t calculate much JSP off that. Today, I look for behavior that I think is distracting and don’t worry too much about it We have the rest of the game to analyze Today.

Ugh, I forgot a period. Here…

He did notice the rule change, though, which was in the same exact post as the updated sample PM.

Playing from your phone? Scum tell.

/joke no one here will get

Actually it says to defeat threats to the slumlords. I can just about buy you mis-reading that, in isolation. I have a much harder time buying that you would do so after multiple exposures, including after seeing YOUR OWN PM saying the same thing.

Incorrect. Original Sample PM was post #1; Corrected Sample PM was post #23; Rules Correction was post #91.

Side note - I’m not familiar with a potential 3rd party aspect, can someone give me a brief breakdown of how they work typically?

Which is that we’re a bunch of raftdwelling slumlords, not that we’re some generic “town”. You can’t have your own “town” alignment in mind and still make that mistake.

vote: Astral Rejection

What’s your position on Astral? You keep commenting, but you’re not saying anything.

Not what I was referring to. Astral mentioned a change due to a “double hammer” (by which I assume he means the “both can die in a tie” rule). The correction needed due to that was to the win condition, which was amended in post 23.

NETA: This –

Astral clearly read this at some point.

Right, let’s review:

So at this point, Astral clearly thinks that CARS are “the opposing force”. Which would be fine, because “Slumlords” does sound scummy, but…

He’s saying he got a PM that told him his team was CARS, but he didn’t really read that bit. He (mis)read the WinCon in such a way that made him think he had to defeat CARS and didn’t notice that the same role PM told him he was CARS.

But then he says:

and…

so he did read his team name. So how could he think that he was CARS and that his goal was to vanquish CARS?

It comes down to this: if you’ve got a PM telling you that you’re CARS, you can’t really think that CARS are the opposing force. On the other hand, if your PM doesn’t tell you this, it’s much easier to think that both CARS and ALE are antiTown. If you were a third party yourself, for example, you might be unclear on the names of both Town and Scum factions.
So I’m pretty sure Astral isn’t Town. However, I think it’s probably a bit more likely that he’s third-party rather than scum. And while I don’t object to third-party lynchings, it’s probably better to try to find scum. So:

unvote Astral

Everyone seems to be jumping on the Astral bandwagon, he is already at 6 votes, half way to the hammer. While to me, it looks like he made a simple mistake from skimming the thread from before the game actually started.

While that might be what happens on day ones, I’m just not feeling the case against him. I don’t know who to vote for so far, but I don’t think it should be Astral. I’ll have more of a chance to get my thoughts together after I get out of rotation this afternoon, (and I’m not reading and posting on my phone).

Oh, and our town name is scummy sounding, and I know I had to wiki my role name since I had no idea who he was. It was only after I read his wiki article I saw he was a good guy.

nod

I was about to post the following, then decided to let it run a bit further first. But as you’ve laid it out already –

I think it quite possible that Astral is a third party/PFK/“third faction”. His original comment, along the lines of “Slumlords-scum PLUS other bad guys EQUALS Alliance of evil that town must defeat” makes a great deal of sense from a skimming/PIS-y third party standpoint. To put it in Ed’s terms:

– Astral’s PM reads Alignment: (not CARS or ALE)
– Astral skims sample townie PM, misreads it as “defeat the CARS”. Since he’s not CARS himself, no warning bells go off.
– ergo CARS are scum
– ergo Alliance of Evil must be scum plus him
– he posts his “insight”, hoping to appear helpful by decoding the setup for the townies. Whoops.

I’m keeping my vote, though, as I want him to claim.

I was under the impression that nabbing a 3rd party was the next best thing to nabbing scum. You’d rather let a 3rd party go? I don’t really understand this line of thinking (I thought it was more along the black-and-white lines of ‘town or NOT TOWN’)

NETA: Is it generally accepted that 3rd party are not a threat till we near end-game, at which time they “need to be dealt with” if known?

sounds so ominous! :slight_smile:

No, it makes just as much sense if not more were he Scum.

He knows he’s a member of ALE. He sees this CARS faction mentioned and wants to make sure Town pays attention to them as well. Or he actually genuinely thought there might be a 3rd faction besides his own

NETA, the last paragraph is not meant as a statement of fact. It’s a hypothetical showing how Astral’s behavior fits if he were a member of ALE.

Nabbing a PFK is somewhat good but not nearly as good as nabbing a scum.

Take the traditional PFK, the serial killer: since they have to kill everyone, killing scum is just as beneficial as killing town for them.

Nabbing a non-exclusive-win third party is beneficial, or not, depending on how that third party has been acting and what their powers are. On the other hand, killing them if they’re playing in support of town is not as bad as killing a real townie because they typically don’t count towards town’s majority in games I’ve played in.

Take the traditional 3rd-Party, the survivor: since they have no powers except voting, and are going to be trying to blend in with town (and thus voting like town), killing them is somewhat bad but not as bad as killing a real townie.

I have been in a game with a serial killer who just annihilated Town; we lynched four scum in a row starting on day 3 (I think) and still lost because the confirmed and semi-confirmed Town were getting mowed down. I’ve also been in a game where Town lynched the SK on day one and lost on Day 5 or so. And I’ve been in a game where the Serial Killers took out half of the scum team (albeit not on purpose).

That said, if Astral is PFK, I think we’re on to a good thing. I broadly agree that while it’s possible he made a straight mistake as Town, it’s relatively hard to see a Townie making quite that misreading. (And making obvious mistakes isn’t something only Townies do; Normal accidentally voted for a claimed Mason in the last game, then blew it off as a glitch; she was scum.)