I’m glad Dewey drove me out of the business of witnessing for libertarianism with hypotheticals. Because nothing could better illustrate the the need for vigilant civil libertarians than the news itself. Slippery slope may be a logical fallacy, but people do not behave logically. Therefore, crying slippery slope whenever someone points out how shit is rolling downhill in a big way is itself the fallacy of non sequitur. Libertarians just will never have the power. It’s up to the liberals now. You people have to save us or it’s over before much longer.
Gives a whole new reason for the cops to tell you to “spread 'em” when they pull you over. Surely enforcing this would end up being sexual harassment of some kind?
I agree with Bubba. I can’t understand why anyone would want to pierce anything down there, but each to their own. Trend-setting should never be enforced by a bunch of politicians.
Looking at the article, it seems that they were trying to ban Female Genital Mutilation, even for consenting adults. They seem dumbfounded that some folks would want a clit or labial ring, and that these people are light years away from the attitudes of those that practice clitorectomy (and other forms of FGM) for cultural and religious reasons.
There’s a huge gulf between the Georgia legislature and the reality of their electorate. Genital piercing isn’t common, but it’s not unheard of by any means. They should grow up and watch a little television.
Now, then, at the very least, obviously the law was to be amended so that grown consenting women can get piercings wherever they damn well please. But what about the stated purpose of the bill? Can the governmnet ban actual Female Genital Mutilation, even for adult women? Can we make the judgment that any woman who would do such a thing to herself must be under some form of coercion, and thus cannot really consent?
I don’t think so. I support a full ban for minors, but adults who want such a drastic procedure done, should be able to have it (provided they can find a licensed practictioner willing to do it, a potentially prohibitive step in and of itself). Basically, this whole bill needs to be rewritten so as to exclude consenting adults from its scope. I have no problem saying minors can’t get genital piercings, with or without parental consent.
Fuck! Just when I’d finally hit on the perfect Mother’s Day gift, this has to happen. Now what do I get for the 70 year old woman who hates everything?
(Of course my mother lives in Alabama, so I could still get her the ring here and she could have the piercing done there…)
Yeah, it sort of looks like they had good intentions, but took it way too far. I’d support a ban on genital mutilation of children, but if an adult woman wants a poonany ring, who cares? The state needs to take its fingers out of her snatch.
I have a few (14) piercings but they are all above the waist. A piercer told me recently that I would be surprised by how many people have genital piercings. In fact, they are the most common below the neck piercings requested at her shop.
A friend recently removed her clit hood ring. She could not walk across the office (at work) without coming close to orgasm. Wow.
What do you expect from a state that made it illegal to sell/purchase sex toys? Toys are also illegal in Alabama, Texas and some other states I can’t remember right now…