I tend to agree with this sentiment, and mostly I’m just trying to strike a reasonable balance between what is said and what is meant. If I give my nephew the benefit of the doubt, I probably don’t have any cause asserting he is being homophobic, at least towards his “skeevey” neighbor. I might be concerned he’s being an elitist, but that’s a whole other can o’ worms I probably shouldn’t get into, cliquish behavior being just one of the many evils of teenhood unlikely to be overcome in my lifetime.
But do I give him the benefit of the doubt? That’s the tricky part. When I grew up, homophobic slurs were certainly tossed around by myself and my friends quite carelessly, and it’s probably not until I got into college that I really made much of an effort to clean up my language. I even remember, when I was a quite young, calling people “wicked queer” (or “wickid queah”, if you count pronounciation), and that didn’t mean “gay”. It meant stupid or lame in a really…well, extra-stupidly lame way. To be honest, I don’t even know what I must have meant exactly, looking back; it’s not like I had even much of a sense of what heterosexuality was all about, much less homosexuality.
But by the teen years, I was getting it all sorted out, as I assume my nephew is. Does he know better? Is he bullshitting me? Is everybody who says “ghey is not gay” bullshitting? Does the etymology really matter in the end? Tough call.
I guess the best I can do is, if I see him using that term again, just say I’d wish he would come up with a better adjective when he chats with me, and leave it at that. Heaven knows, if I give him a speech I’d A) Be something of a hypocrite, since I can’t claim I was any better at his age, and B) Probably annoy him and perhaps make matters worse, since teens can be so contrarian.