Glenn Beck shedding advertisers

I was worried to mention a pet theory of mine, but that article that **emarkp **posted shows that it was correct.

We should not forget what IMHO was one of the best vaccines against fascism and Communism in America:

The GI Bill.

Many forget that after WWI soldiers that had little to no benefits created a lot of unrest. Protests turned violent in Washington and fears of revolution grew, of course if former soldiers got a raw deal it would not be surprising that the USA would end up like Russia; at the same time: from the extreme right it was likely that many of those former soldiers were also approached by the American elites to begin to set up a fascist putsch.

Just after the end of WWII many feared the idea that either the extreme right or the left could get a hold of an even bigger army, that this time could be made out of 2.2 million disgruntled servicemen.

Of course, the main reason offered for passing the GI Bill was that we needed to keep that force employed, but it is clear that one powerful reason why to pass it was to prevent massive unemployment, economic depression or social unrest.

Guess why the bill was approved by just one vote?

Because racist congressmen complained that also black soldiers were going to benefit too…

Yes, my theory was that there was a racist component of the opposition to health care reform; however, I naively expected that this time it was not going to be a factor so I disregard it.

However, the article from IBD is attempting to raise racist emotions. Like MeanOldLady said: the article is actually saying that the health plan is an “underhanded scheme to take money back from whitey and give it to black people”.

It was bad enough that in reality the opponents of health reform are fighting to continue to limit the freedoms of the American worker.

It is worse now when the opponents of health care reform resort to virtually the same tactics of the opponents of the GI Bill. One has to wonder how the opponents can have peace of mind and sleep soundly every night.

The understanding that the anger of the health care debate, anger that people can’t articulate, can’t point to specific realities as a cause, can’t resist reacting to deliberate lies being spread through the media, is really displaced anger due to the inability for anyone to directly express hated toward a black president is bubbling up into the mainsteam media. A segment on the evening news hinted at it badly. The follow-up segment was on the resurgence of white militant groups. A continuum is brewing.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/07/29/2009-07-29_fox_news_glenn_beck_president_barack_obama_is_racist_with_deepseated_hatred_of_w.html

The code words are being passed around at a rate that would have astonished the coded BBC references to the French Resistance. They are, admittedly, much simpler. Racist = black. Spending = socialism. Czars = diktats = Nazism. Deficits = taxes. End of the white majority = not our America.

Those infiltrating town hall rallies have been thoroughly indoctrinated in code. That seems to be all they speak. As some post-interviews confirm, they have no idea why they’re angry, no idea of what’s in the [incomplete bill that the senators admit they haven’t finished because they out in the “real world” talking to "real people, expecting them to ask questions, not spew inarticulate renderings of the lies heard on TV talk shows, yet knowing that the crazier the yeller the better chance that exchange is the one the networks will use, not the patient explanations and crown control and fear- waning] but nevertheless gathering and gauging he lack of public support for the bill, which they said repeatedly that they haven’t read. Why should they have when when wily aides are willing to interpret for then, changing counseling into death panels and Medicaid into a money-losing failure, while extolling the magic of insurance compares who love them, while shouting and spewing hate against anyone who dares to disagree. Yes, we’ve now come from a complex discussion, negotiation, deal for the soul of health care and turned it so a lack of answers is a conspiracy theory and then all is lost.

kaylasdad99, thank goodness that font was disabled! I’m too old for that kind of fright!

If you want to know exactly how offensive what you said is, try substituting the word “black” for the word “old.” If you want to know how stupid it is, think of David Simmons.

It seems as though you have a very different idea of hateful than I do. You don’t seem to find anything wrong with saying that allowing gays to marriage is an attack on churches, or that gays being allowed to serve openly in the military would derail the entire United States. Of course, not so much because their being itself is inherently wrong, but that their actions might interfere with the mission. You see, the gays will butt-fuck our troops so thoroughly that the terrorists will win.

And so Poe’s Law continues to expand its scope.

:rolleyes: IF ONLY!

From “Obama’s Timid Liberalism,” by Michael Lind:

Hawking’s own view is that he wouldn’t be alive without Britain’s National Health Service: “I wouldn’t be here today if it were not for the NHS,” he told journalists recently. “I have received a large amount of high-quality treatment without which I would not have survived.”

I wonder if those advertisers are regretting it.
“Big Beck: Goes over 3 million viewers, beats O’Reilly in demo: Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, August 26, 2009”

Given that they’re continuing to drop him (and in GEICO’s case, Fox as a whole), I doubt it.

Since he’s just lost ten more advertisers (for a total of 46 to date), I doubt it. 3 million might sound like a lot, but it’s not enough to offset the millions more that these companies would risk alienating by continuing to associate themseves with Beck. Kraft wants to sell cheese and salad dressing, it doesn’t want to narrow itself to only selling to right wing crazies.

CITE?

Sorry to post late, story of my life.

I’m in the broadcast biddness and have been looking at radio sponsor rejections for at least 30 years, if not 40. Here’s a list from one group of sponsors. This is radio, mind you, but I can see the spill-over to cable:

  • These sponsors have requested their copy not air in controversial programming such as Dr. Laura, Tom Leykis, Lovelines, Bill Bennett, Lex and Terry, Larry Elder, Renan Show, Ken Hamblin, Madhouse, Neil Rogers, WQAM, Drew & Mike, Bob Grant, Michael Savage Show, Air America, Opie & Anthony, Mark Belling, G. Gordon Liddy, Don & Mike, Mancow, Rush Limbaugh and John & Ken. Spots should be moved to another acceptable daypart. Thank you for your cooperation.

Good Luck finding another daypart if you’re doing Air America.
Anyway, I’m going to guess that Beck was under their radar until the “Obama is a racist” got headlines. Then those advertisers had him added to the list, too.
Very standard.

Not just Air America. Many AM radio stations are virtually 100% conservative talk in their formats.