Might as well kill off this millenium in style by overasking why it has been the why it has. Query #1:
The more-or-less internationally standardized symbols distinguishing (or melding) men’s from women’s restrooms are roughly something like (if this form cooperates):
. ()
.| || |
.|{}|
. | |
. | |
and
. ()
.|/|
.|/|
./__
. | |
. | |
. . .BUT. . .I’ve seen (at times other than while watching Mama kissing Santa Claus) people in jeans and slacks go into the johns [janes?] bearing the latter glyph. There’s something wrong here!
The basic problem seems to be that, in attempting to avoid overstimulation of the male, the distinction of the female symbol is centered on an arbitrary (?, see my next post) style of dress.
How are we going to correct this in the next millenium? Should we adopt the symbols used on the plaque in the capsule shot into space. . .and assume no overreaction to it will result? Or will we use glyphs of XY and XX chromosomes. (The biological symbols for male and female, of course, should’ve stayed in the 19th Century.) Then again, overall (is that the word I want?) human waste disposal systems may change.
Ray (Stay tuned.)