Yes, there were, and gms still stood out, did you notice? It’s not about being mean, really. It’s about the nasty little assumptions implicit in the question, and the smug little attitude in the repetition (note that it is still going on), and … oh, shudder ..
That, I think, is what people took offense at, the choice of words. Everyone was wondering why Roxy hooked up with the guy.
Was that a very bad pun, or do you really live that far back in the cave?
No, you weren’t, or you wouldn’t have used the words “allow” and “impregnate”, and as everyone knows that, you should admit it.
No, you go back and provide a cites for every comment you made about other posters.
I know what you said; every knows what you said. It pissed a lot of people off. We assume that’s what you wanted.
Why do you insist on conflating sex with pregnancy? They are not the same.
Well aren’t you a little ray of sunshine? Feeling overworked or something? Hardly my fault, but do be sure to let us know when you retire so we can complain about being forced “to give up our money to keep your withered ass sucking air year after year” m’k? Not that it’s true but it sure sounds good doesn’t it?
As for net drain on society, having worked (sometimes 2-3 jobs) for decades, and having not produced children that are a major drain on society for at least 18 years each, I’d say I’m way ahead of most folks in this net worth contest of yours.
And re my neighbor’s specks, I have no idea what you are on about. But yeah, you go ahead and threadshit all you want, I’ve got beer and NCIS will be on in an hour and a half.
Why? She claimed I said certain things about others which I did not. I simply asked her to provide cites to substantiate those claims. I am still waiting to hear back from her on this.
I agree; I agree. Oh, well. Not at all.
I don’t, but just in case YOU’RE not sure about the connection between the two: Having one sometimes results in the other, especially if you’re not careful.
And that’s what it’s all about, isn’t it? Not “oh, my” curiosity.
She wasn’t “careful”.
She got what she deserved? She made her bed, now she has to lie in it? Even, she’s no better than she should be?
So, do you mean “careful”? I ask, because you seem a little confused about some words. Like “conflate”, because your certainly have been conflating sex and pregnancy, and “allow”.
Does she claim to have a physical disability? On a more serious note, O’Reilly claims disability claims have doubled under Obama’s administration, despite no changes in assessment (the most common being arthritis for seniors). Probably because he’s the antichrist.
Matthew 7:5. Jesus didn’t really care about whether someone’s rig was overclocked, in case you were wondering.
Thank you for this. Yes, GMS453 is either a troll or very stupid. Which is why I pretty much ignored him in my thread. So here’s a few reminders to GMS453
Women don’t have to be madly in love and planning to spend the rest of their lives with someone in order to be sexually involved with them.
Pregnancy while sexually active is not 100% preventable.
It is every woman’s right to CHOOSE whether or not she terminates a pregnancy.
It is also a woman’s right to choose whether or not she feels marrying the father of the child is in the best interests of all involved.
Lastly, it is every woman’s right to protect herself in the event things don’t go well and the happily ever after doesn’t happen for whatever reason.
I would assume these things are quite obvious so I didn’t feel the need to expand on them in my thread. However, since you are quite clearly uninformed to a human beings right to be sexual and continue an unexpected pregnancy, I am happy to assist in educating you on the issues.
I don’t know and I don’t care, but if you do, FL’s answer to my query was that she was on the pill at the time.
Again, I don’t know and I don’t care (and I’m bemused by your irrational insistence that I must).
Your harangue about me considering sex (ie., coitus) and pregnancy the same thing is patently absurd. They are not the same thing, but-obviously-are connected. For those of you who have difficulty grasping the obvious, here’s how: A person who engages in sex and does not want their doing so to result in pregnancy should be careful.
I’m surprised that you posted this. Surely you know that the use of mixed metaphors is frowned upon by all those who have even a modicum of intelligence and education.
I’ve always known that; apparently, you had to find out the hard way.
I never said it wasn’t.
I never said it wasn’t.
I never said it wasn’t.
I am stunned by the cupidity displayed in your post, particularly since your answer to the one and only question I ever asked you was so simple, straightforward and on point. As for your offer to help educate me on the issues, given your track record, I think I’ll pass.
Uh, did you not notice that I was trying to interpret what someone else said, guesses as to what gms453 meant by the question that started this Pit thread? I personally have not said a thing to the OP of the original thread, whose name I have totally forgotten, so you coming in and blathering on about her dropping to her knees and time machines has zero to do with what you quoted of my post.
My only issue with the OP of the original thread is that she looked like she was gloating about leaving her husband in the lurch, and I was in no way alone in that. Anything else I’ve posted in here as been in regards to what gms453 has said.
I don’t really care what a bunch of strangers on the internet want to believe about me, but I will point out that anyone that thinks I’m scamming the government doesn’t know diddly about SSDI. Yes, there are twits here who have decided that about me based on a couple of posts, but I’m quite sure they only do that because they don’t like my views on the children of today.